By: magicmazza_2000 3/05/2008 10:26 pm Yahoo! Profile: magicmazza_2000 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| wataloadarubbish, don't you think it is time to move on. My favourite was Virginia but I am not going to gripe about her not winning. I think Julia was a wonderful worthy winner, the show is over, time to get over it and move on! |
|
By: daph3799 2/05/2008 8:16 pm Yahoo! Profile: daph3799 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| No, but I thought it was a good copy and quite appropriate for all those 18-year-old university graduate geniuses (genii)? They would understand it as being familiar to them. |
|
By: sonlmor 2/05/2008 7:29 pm Yahoo! Profile: sonlmor Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Daph- you haven't been posting on these threads as Courtney or annie, with that wonderful grammar back there have you LOL |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 6:05 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
should HAVE, could HAVE, would HAVE, SHOULDN'T HAVE, couldn't HAVE, wouldn't HAVE, etc. etc. etc. Do you get the picture, wataloadarubbish?
Apology accepted. |
|
By: wataloadarubbish 2/05/2008 5:56 pm Yahoo! Profile: wataloadarubbish Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Okay, I agree I shouldnt of said the "suckers" thing for that I apologise, but as for the weight and age thing I was refferring to what Julia said on tv.As I said before I dont have any problems with her weight , age etc. I never referred to her weight or age negatively at all! |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 5:50 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
****Gee Daph ....you need to go to grammer lessons I dont recall speaking like that as I was only stating my opinions and I did not in any way say anything here to demean any posters.****
I can assure you that Daph doesn't need grammAR lessons, as she always has an excellent command of the English language, except after reading some message board comments....lol.
As for you not demeaning any posters/viewers - I think calling them suckers for voting for Julia is pretty demeaning, as is criticising Julia for her age and weight when that is not what the competition is about.
Still, we acknowledge that you are upset that Virginia didn't win, but I'm sure she would rather you accept the results with good grace, as she herself did. |
|
By: daph3799 2/05/2008 5:18 pm Yahoo! Profile: daph3799 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Wataloadarubbish, you are right, you don't write like that but many on these threads do and it is driving me batty. I simply do not agree with your opinions on this subject as I think that Julia was a very worthy winner. I know that we all see things differently and that we must accept each other's opinions. It seems that more people agreed with me when it came to voting than agreed with you. None of this matters enough to get cross about it as the winners only get a funny trophy and we get a few weeks of good entertainment. Avagoodweegend! |
|
By: wataloadarubbish 2/05/2008 4:17 pm Yahoo! Profile: wataloadarubbish Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Gee Daph...you need to go to grammer lessons I dont recall speaking like that as I was only stating my opinions and I did not in any way say anything here to demean any posters. If you feel the need to do that to me then fine, thats your right as is mine, but maybe you need to grow up a little or swap over to the H@A forum.Hopefully they wont be too "grown up" for you to understand. |
|
By: daph3799 2/05/2008 3:39 pm Yahoo! Profile: daph3799 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Wataloadarubbish. Watarubbishyspeller. Don't you know .......hold on I'll try to translate into your language.
Done u now that Jula nd David wer the bestest enertiners their all the tyme? I licked tham bicoz they shood of one bicoz they woz wundirfil. They done good! They wuz betta thin all the uthas an thats my oppinon, so their! |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 3:37 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Would HAVE, Still HAVE......etc.
The show is about:
musical entertainment,
celebrities trying their hand at something they may have wanted to do but not had the opportunity until now, and they can get paid for it, plus learn from professional singers,
raising money for charity,
among other things.
It isn't a popularity contest, although some couples have gone further than perhaps warranted on the strength of viewer voting, but in all three series - the best couple has won, in the opinion of judges and majority of voters.
Still, I guess you won't have to worry about it any more as I'm sure you won't bother to watch the next series. |
|
By: wataloadarubbish 2/05/2008 3:23 pm Yahoo! Profile: wataloadarubbish Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| If Virginia had won then yes I would still of wanted the voting system changed....as you would of if Paul had won which he very nearly did. It's easy to say that you wouldnt care now as the results are in ,and someone that was your fav. won but they may as well just hold a popularity contest for all its worth. I'm sure that they could get money through advertising rights as they usually do if they really wanted to but they get so much money from this stupid system they couldnt be bothered. |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 3:13 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Don't you know anything about Copyright laws?
Where do you think Channel 7 is going to get the money for charities if not from phone voting?
Julia/David and Virginia/Ian both scored 69 points from the judges in the semi-final. J&D scored lowest for one song, and V&I scored lowest for another. Just how this makes one couple lower than the other, I'm not sure.
If Virginia had won, would you be wanting the voting changed? |
|
By: twoleftfeet44 2/05/2008 3:10 pm Yahoo! Profile: twoleftfeet44 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
1. should HAVE not should OF.
2. When you purchase an overseas format show, with copyright, etc attached you can't change it - anyway the way it operates now seems to work - after all they are not competing for "sheepstations" the aim of the exercise is to entertain which most of the posters here seem to agree it does. |
|
By: wataloadarubbish 2/05/2008 2:47 pm Yahoo! Profile: wataloadarubbish Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Doesnt matter how they bought the show they should still change it....so that the judges vote counts only, they only do this so they can get money from people who vote they could still give money to the winners charity and others depending on where they placed. Julia and David should of gone home when Virginia did they voted the lowest on the night according to the judges. |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 2:39 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Should HAVE, Should HAVE, Should HAVE, Geewhiz, it's hard to get through to some people.
Obviously, the judges and most of the voters thought she was the best - and if you can't see that her mentioning her age, etc. was a joke, then you take things far too seriously.
As for the voting system - forget it! It's unlikely to change because that's the way the program was copyrighted by the BBC. |
|
By: wataloadarubbish 2/05/2008 2:28 pm Yahoo! Profile: wataloadarubbish Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Magicmazza...actually I didnt bring up her age and weight ....she did when she was throwing it in to get people to vote for her. I couldnt give a st uff what she weighs or her age she was only 3rd best and thats where she should of placed going on her actual talent and thats why they should change the stupid voting system. |
|
By: magicmazza_2000 2/05/2008 1:40 pm Yahoo! Profile: magicmazza_2000 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Beco, I thought your new logo was so good I decided to use it.That is true Tv adding kilos, Julie just seems to be such a happy fun person. |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 1:15 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
magic - the writer was actually 'wataloadarubbish', the 'watasoreloser' was my suggestion, but the rest of your comments were pretty spot on.
In truth, Julia is very likely much slimmer in real life - it's a known fact that TV cameras can make a person look several kilos heavier. |
|
By: magicmazza_2000 2/05/2008 12:45 pm Yahoo! Profile: magicmazza_2000 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| WHATASORELOSER....That was just nasty, Julia is lovely, there is no need for personal attacks about her weight and age, I think you need to grow up! |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 12:14 pm Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| andie - I do seem to be going around in circles, don't I? Must have gotten giddy and crashed into the truck - hope I didn't do it any damage just in case we need it again...lol |
|
By: sonlmor 2/05/2008 12:00 pm Yahoo! Profile: sonlmor Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Lets face it.......Julia & David appealed more on a whole to the wider viewing public |
|
By: andie1100 2/05/2008 11:57 am Yahoo! Profile: andie1100 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Beco, I was wondering how that blood got on the side of the truck. It was you banging your head against it! lol |
|
By: becoblue 2/05/2008 11:44 am Yahoo! Profile: becoblue Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
wataloadarubbish - you're next ID could well be watasoreloser.
The best 3 couples were in the semi-final. Virginia may possibly have been the best singer, technically, with Julia and Russell not far behind.
However, in a show like ITT there is more to a performance than just singing a song. The presentation counts for a lot with both judges and viewers, and in that department, Julia and David were streets ahead of the rest.
Viewers voted well for Julia right from Episode 1 because they appreciated the entertainment value, she didn't have to wait until 'after her birthday'. Virginia (and possibly, Ian) simply didn't have quite enough viewer support. I imagine that Russell had a great deal of viewer support but in the Final it just wasn't quite enough.
Viewers vote for celebrities or couples for a variety of reasons - and there's nothing wrong with that.
You are entitled to your opinion as to who was the best singer, should have won, etc. just as we are.
By the way, it's 'should have' not 'should of'. When will people learn? |
|
By: sonlmor 2/05/2008 10:28 am Yahoo! Profile: sonlmor Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Thats your opinion, and your entitled to it. In my opinion, your opinion screams WHATALOADARUBBISH........ .. |
|
By: wataloadarubbish 2/05/2008 10:17 am |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|