By: piesyndrome 2/07/2009 4:10 pm Yahoo! Profile: piesyndrome Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Scarrpi I think you mean play WITH himself |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 3:46 pm Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
C'mon people.U should know that brownoze is correct about everything...Everything., ...Now its time for everyone to leave yahoo and leave bronoze to play by himself.
Imagine that brownoze and 50 aliases |
|
By: brat_084 2/07/2009 3:15 pm Yahoo! Profile: brat_084 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| brownoz, I never said that Rioli's 10 possession g/f display was poor, just that I don't remember much about his game from that day. What I did say was in response to your comment that none of the 15 opposition teams can beat Rioli this yr, but that the Cats held him pretty damn well in rnd 1 where he was beaten. Absolutely nothing to do with last yrs g/f, but that is one game you just can't move on from and keeping bringing up, its about time you move on from the 08 g/f, we are in a new season and you need to move fwd, stop living in the past because if the Hawks fans & players are doing as you do brownoz they won't win another g/f again. |
|
By: jeffs358 2/07/2009 1:41 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: rbrownoz 2/07/2009 12:48 pm Yahoo! Profile: rbrownoz Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
one for me that is never mentioned is gilham,he did a wonderful job in defence that game and was close to being in the best,either way it doesnt matter chucker just used a couple of points as michelle seemed to think his 10 posessions were poor so was happy to correct
rioli yes and sewell have been a two best this year no doubt and for a 19 year old to dominate the competition like rioli is unheard of and yes not even selwood was that good |
|
By: once_was_chucker 2/07/2009 12:39 pm Yahoo! Profile: once_was_chucker Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
So, apart for Dew Young Ellis and Hodge, and discounting the Geelong efforts, Rioli was best on ground, brownoz??
And if Sewell had a poor game, then I am glad he is in my footytips team , because **** me, if he plays a good game, he will score 200 |
|
By: rbrownoz 2/07/2009 12:26 pm Yahoo! Profile: rbrownoz Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| yes young hurt himself in the opening minutes of the 3rd qt,he was running off selwood before that and tearing him apart our leading posession winning to that time and he kicked a 65 metre goal to stop geelong's run |
|
By: rbrownoz 2/07/2009 12:21 pm Yahoo! Profile: rbrownoz Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
chucker your knowledge is poor,sewell played a poor first qt beaten by bartel who picked up 13 posessions and it was after that he dominated the midfield
ellis played the game of his life a no brainer really but was very proud o him
dew yes the 5 minutes in front of goal changed the game and before that happened rioli sparked the hawks into gear,the noise form hawks fans after he destroyed 3 senior geelong opponents was never before heard of in football and then he scored the first of those 4 goals in 5 minutes from a dew pass |
|
By: nyeninch 2/07/2009 12:19 pm Yahoo! Profile: nyeninch Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Yeah, it was Young - I had him as my NS winner at half time.
Rioli had a good game, that effort where he beat 3 players in a fight for the ball was classic GF stuff. He kicked a couple of goals too - but he was a long way behind Sewell, Young and Hodge as our best on the day.
Still, a fair effort for a kid in his first season. |
|
By: brat_084 2/07/2009 12:17 pm Yahoo! Profile: brat_084 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| was it Young who got injured in the 3rd for the Hawks? Whoever it was was pushing for the Norm Smith at the time and tearing the Cats apart, was glad when he went down because I thought it would give us a chance but I was wrong. |
|
By: once_was_chucker 2/07/2009 12:14 pm Yahoo! Profile: once_was_chucker Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Brat, my recollection of the GF was that Ellis and Sewell were the standout Hawks of the first half hour, if not on ground, and without them, the game would have been over by half time. |
|
By: nyeninch 2/07/2009 12:09 pm Yahoo! Profile: nyeninch Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I had expected a fired up Hawks, fresh from 2 weeks of Clarkson fire and brimstone, to rip in against the Egos - we didn't have that at all, the effort was no better than the Lions game.
From here, with finals looking increasingly unlikely, all I want is for the team to show some fight (footy fight, not 'line in the sand' bull5hit fight!). If we can get back to playing some respectable footy, then I'll be happy - if we keep dishing up this carp, I'll be less than impressed! |
|
By: brat_084 2/07/2009 12:09 pm Yahoo! Profile: brat_084 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
don't really care if i lost your respect because I never respected you to start with. But maybe you can answer just 1 question brownoz - over the last 3 or 4 weeks you have credited 3 or 4 players as being "THE REASON" the Hawks won the g/f. 1st it was Dew "with the best 5mins ever in a g/f", then it was Scarlett's fault Geelong lost because "Buddy dominated him in the 3rd which turned the game around for the Hawks", today your saying it was Rioli who sparked the 3rd qtr trashing - and sry to say but I don't really remember much of Rioli from the match, I remember Dew & Hodge but nothing of Rioli. I believe you also blamed Mooney or a couple of other Cats players - please make up your mind because it seems your describing a different game each time with your lack of consistency.
And as for Rioli dominating this yr, maybe its a case that the opposition is shutting down the players around him, making him look better because he is the only one able to have an influence on the game. Like how people asked how good is Selwood really, does he just look better because of the blokes around him, especially when they get tagged and he wasn't giving him a much greater role, well now he is the one getting tagged. So maybe the opp don't think Rioli can do as much damage as guys like Mitchell, Sewell, Buddy, Williams etc so they are letting him go. |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 12:05 pm Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Yes i remember tigers beat wc 2 weeks ago with cox playing in the team and brownoze said was nothing to be proud off.
Fast forward to the next round and hawks lose to a very young and inexperienced team without there main ruckman.And he still uses excuses |
|
By: brat_084 2/07/2009 12:03 pm Yahoo! Profile: brat_084 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
wasn't the wind rather strong on Sat night for the match? When its windy its really hard for either team to win by 60pts because you will struggle kicking against the wind as we saw with the Cats against Port game also. The major diff between the 2 teams Sat night was the Eagles keeping level with the Hawks when the Hawks had the wind, but the Hawks struggled kicking into the wind in the last - they were always going to need a 20-30pt lead at the last change to win due to the wind.
And its annoying me people are saying the Cats went to sleep in the last on Sunday, we didn't have the best quarter but we were beaten both time kicking against the wind so how about people look at the conditions and not just the stats, because the only way for us to win by 60 on Sunday was to be leading by 100pts at the last change. |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 12:00 pm Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Bit like brownoze.He gained more repsect when he was away from these boards.As soon as he came back he lost it all |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 11:59 am Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Thats why i corrected it ammmat |
|
By: ammmatt 2/07/2009 11:59 am Yahoo! Profile: ammmatt Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
OOOOOOOps i mean peace....Just thought id fix it before someone goes me about my spelling.;)
LOL SCARP'S |
|
By: rbrownoz 2/07/2009 11:58 am Yahoo! Profile: rbrownoz Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
young michelle,rioli had 10 posessions in last years gf too yet his 10 posessions were considered that of greatness,yes we all remember the first year player winning the ball off 3 senior geelong players and sparking the 3rd qt thrashing
have yet to see a team be effective in stopping rioli this year and by trying to undermine him you lose respect |
|
By: ammmatt 2/07/2009 11:58 am Yahoo! Profile: ammmatt Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
peace woman - you've gone to pieces without him.
< warning things are grim when I correct ya spelling:) |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 11:57 am Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| OOOOOOOps i mean peace....Just thought id fix it before someone goes me about my spelling.;) |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 11:57 am Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Ive actually been at piece.Its been good actually having a convo without his input. |
|
By: nyeninch 2/07/2009 11:56 am Yahoo! Profile: nyeninch Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Ignore him girls. Everyone that saw the game knows the Hawks had the better of the umpiring. Sure, a 'lesser' side may have lost by 60 points, but there are not many lesser sides right now. A better side would've won by 60 - the Eagles are poor right now, the trouble is we're worse.
I do think we have a great list and we will be amongst it for a while yet, but this year is just one to write off now! |
|
By: ammmatt 2/07/2009 11:55 am Yahoo! Profile: ammmatt Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| am glad you're back browns- scarp's has been wandering around lost without you.:D |
|
By: scarpi222 2/07/2009 11:54 am Yahoo! Profile: scarpi222 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| How dare u use facts brat.;) |
|