By: kalaloha2
8/07/2009
10:39 am Yahoo! Profile:
kalaloha2 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
lone wan*er,
did you like you dad as well? Maybe he was not tto good to you bra boy ? |
|
By: busybee6461
8/07/2009
10:47 am Yahoo! Profile:
busybee6461 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I'm sure it was heartbreaking for her to speak about Michael.
However I would question by what standard they judge Michael the be a great dad. After all what would they know about great dads?
What would you know..what would I know?
Im not even going to debate this..
get a life. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
8/07/2009
10:54 am Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Yes John I liked my dad. The difference between me and Michael Jackson's kids is that my dad was also my father. Michael has no biological connection to the kids he calls his. As I understand it he never even adopted them.
The other difference is probably the most important one here.
I grew up with dozens of other kids from all different backgrounds, some with and some without dads. It was immediately after WWII. I could compare my dad to my friends dads when I visited their homes, over many years.
I don't think the Jackson kids have had that exposure to the outside world to be able to make a valued judgement on whether he was a good dad or not.
And the little girl seemed to be coached in my opinion on what to say. I wasn't convinced at all. |
|
By: yodas_missus
8/07/2009
11:13 am Yahoo! Profile:
yodas_missus Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Michael has no biological connection to the kids he calls his. As I understand it he never even adopted them."
******
And you know this for a fact do you? Or are you just believing what you've heard about in the tabloid press? They may not be his biological children, but they could well be - the fact is we don't know for sure and unless and until any DNA testing is made public then we will never know!
Little Paris, just like you, would have had exposure to other dads and their children (her many uncles as one example), so is well placed to voice her opinion about having a great dad.
Debbie Rowe has never shown any interest whatsoever in those children, except for the dollars she was given to bear them. That was her only interest in them and she has apparently said as much. She is a complete stranger to them and should not be given custody of them at all. They belong with their family where they have the love of the family they have always known.
How would you have liked it as a child aged about 11 if some stranger just turned up one day and said you were going to live with them now and you would never see your family again? That would be the most horrendous thing that could possibly happen to those children. |
|
By: kalaloha2
8/07/2009
11:34 am Yahoo! Profile:
kalaloha2 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Dallone, point taken, but not totally agreeable.
Coached? So was Bindi Irwin, and other precious kids who have to face the ever hungry media for comments. What would you expect for someone that young? |
|
By: diverserichtapestry
8/07/2009
11:48 am Yahoo! Profile:
diverserichtapestry Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| MJ's daughter and former girlfriend Brooke Shields completely silenced and refuted her daddies haters forever - MJ won - his haters lost - he will be remembered for who he truly was - pure and caring. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
8/07/2009
12:08 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: peaceleo69
9/07/2009
2:10 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Leo, I am quite sure the nanny could do a credible job in raising the kids. If she has had her own that is, and has a track record in this area, otherwise she is just a learner, like any new parent is. Like Debbie would be.
><><
Dalone-how could she be a learner-when she had raised them fro 12 years????
And Debbie still says she cant decide if she wants them or not-not the kind of thing you want to hear from a prospective mother!
><><
On Debbie, I don't believe it would have been her who insisted the kids faces be covered, especially if as you say she wasn't interested in them. That sounds very Michael, who had done so for years himself.
dalone-YOU mightn't beleive it-but as she said it when she was interviewed-that:'it wasnt Michael's decision-it was her suggestion-I think SHE must have believed it!
It was also she who said she wasnt cut out to be a mother,she was happy for Michael to have them and was sure Michael was a wonderful father.
><
Michael only married her so she could have children for him. I am sure he never had any intention of her continuing in his, and the children's lives, after he had finished using her for that purpose. For goodness sake, he didn't even have sex with her to make the children his, but used someone else's sperm. They have no biological connection to him whatsoever. What sort of father would not even use his own sperm to make children for himself.
Most of what you write is pure supposition but if this was the case-she was obviously a willing participant in the whole scenario.
But none of this has been proved anyway. And it isnt uncommon to use other peoples sperm-who even knows if Michael was fertile-not me!
Why should they go to a mother who doesnt even know if she wants them-to a nanny they do not know; when they can be with a loving grandmother they know, a nanny who has raised them all thier lives and an extended family and friends who loves them!
Why would you take them away from all that love and security ... |
|
By: peaceleo69
9/07/2009
2:11 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"NOTHING STRANGE" ABOUT DADDY
Jackson was on the eve of a comeback after his career collapsed in the 1990s. The exact cause of his death is still awaiting toxicology results amid reports of abuse of prescription drugs, including the powerful sedative Diprivan.
Civil rights leader Al Sharpton, who has lashed out at media coverage of the bizarre aspects of Jackson's life, had a message for the singer's three children.
"Wasn't nothing strange about your daddy. It was strange what your daddy had to deal with," he said.
The children -- Prince Michael Jr., 12, Paris-Michael Katherine and Prince Michael II, 7 -- joined the family on stage for a mass chorus of Jackson's inspirational hits "We Are the World" and "Heal the World."
Paris, in tears, took the microphone to say: "Ever since I was born my daddy has been the best father you can ever imagine, and I just wanted to say I love him, so much." |
|
By: dallone.ranger
9/07/2009
11:10 am Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Civil rights leader Al Sharpton, who has lashed out at media coverage of the bizarre aspects of Jackson's life, had a message for the singer's three children.
"Wasn't nothing strange about your daddy. It was strange what your daddy had to deal with," he said.
~~~~~~
What a load of rubbish. |
|
By: robbyisme
9/07/2009
1:46 pm Yahoo! Profile:
robbyisme Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
wether they r his or not. Those kids lost a father they obviously loved.
They should go where they feel they want/need to go not what the adults think.Those adults r not thinking about the kids but the kids' inheritance. |
|
By: borg_hero
9/07/2009
2:10 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: musicman_75
9/07/2009
2:56 pm Yahoo! Profile:
musicman_75 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Michael Jackson has gone now. Fans should let him rest in peace now. Its family business where he gets bury not the fans. This obsession has to stop your not making his music live your making his music die.
If your true fan you would play his cds and sing to his songs. Instead of tv channel showing tribute to him. Whatever happen to kids is family business not the fan business. Debbie Rowe interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=falMW8NA70c
When fans say everybody has his albums in their collection I don't and why should I? I have different music taste and that's hard rock and country music. I remember watching the Jackson 5 show when I was young, fans have gone out of hand now. |
|
By: musicman_75
9/07/2009
3:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
musicman_75 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Michael Jackson has gone now. Fans should let him rest in peace now. Its family business where he gets bury not the fans. This obsession has to stop your not making his music live your making his music die.
If your true fan you would play his cds and sing to his songs. Instead of tv channel showing tribute to him.
Whatever happen to the kids is the family business not the fan business. Debbie Rowe interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=falMW8NA70c
When fans say everybody has his albums in their collection I don't and why should I? I have different music taste and that's hard rock and country music. I remember watching the Jackson 5 show when I was young, fans have gone out of hand now. |
|
By: musicman_75
9/07/2009
3:05 pm Yahoo! Profile:
musicman_75 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I find Civil rights leader Al Sharpton was wrong to bring up Live Aid did nothing their did. |
|
By: tash8497
9/07/2009
10:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
tash8497 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| robbyisme, I think that whoever judges/decides regarding where the children will go will take their opinions into account in making that decision. It wld appear that they would be better off surrounded by their cousins, aunts, Uncles etc of the Jackson clan, rather than a woman whom they hardly know and who wld split them up. I wish them all the best for their futures and lots of love. |
|
By: peaceleo69
10/07/2009
12:44 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| amen;tash! |
|
By: fysh_phrts
10/07/2009
3:35 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: fysh_phrts
10/07/2009
3:36 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: peaceleo69
11/07/2009
1:18 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
http://au.lifestyle.yahoo.com/who/news/08072009/mi chael-jacksons-dermatologist-i-am-not-father.html
Michael Jackson's Dermatologist: 'I Am Not the Father'
Dr. Arnold Klein also says he is not being investigated for giving the late singer drugs
Source: People.com
Thursday, Jul 09, 2009
He is alleged to be the real father of Michael Jackson's children. Another claim says he is being investigated for prescribing the singer dangerous narcotic pain medications and anesthesia. Now, Jackson's longtime dermatologist, Dr. Arnold Klein, speaks out to address the rumors.
Klein, a Professor of Dermatology and Medicine at UCLA medical school, and a favorite of stars such as Elizabeth Taylor, flatly denies any involvement in over-prescribing drugs to Jackson.
"I didn't give him this crap they are talking about," Klein states in a new interview with Good Morning America. "I've never prescribed Oxycontin in my life. How am I going to prescribe Diprivan [a.k.a. Propofol, which is used for anesthesia] when I don't understand how to use it?"
He also denied being one of five doctors reportedly under investigation in the state of California for writing prescriptions for Jackson's medications. "I am not even under any examination by the police as one of those individuals," he said. "I have not been examined by anyone. I have not been contacted by the police in Los Angeles."
Klein also says that Jackson did not appear to be in severe pain - or to be battling addiction - during their last meeting, which was the Monday before Jackson's death. "He danced in my office. He danced for my patients. He was very muscular and he was very, very happy and dancing," Klein says. "I saw nothing at that point in time that would make me worry whatsoever."
When asked if a rumor that he was the real father of Jackson's three children, Prince Michael, 12, Paris Katherine, 11, and Prince Michael II (Blanket), 7, was true, Klein offered a denial - sort of. |
|
By: winklebarge
11/07/2009
1:30 am Yahoo! Profile:
winklebarge Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
hi n bye peace.
Yep,I saw him interviewed on Larry King 2 days ago.He said "to the best of my knowledge"..but not ruling it out.Seems an ok guy.
Keep on keeping on and ignore the fools..back in 2 wks or so :) |
|
By: peaceleo69
11/07/2009
1:37 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"All I can tell you is, to the best of my knowledge, I am not the father of these children," Klein said. "I can't answer it any other way. I don't want to feed any of this insanity going around." He did express a fondness for his friend's children adding, "These are brilliant children and I want them in no way to be harmed ... People should know the depth of [Jackson's] love of his children."
><
For those who say Michael wasnt thier real father-I dont know who has proof of this but I wonder if any of those have actually seen a photo of these children and compared them with Michael at a smilar age?
And to call them Michaels 'white kids' ;is pretty rascist-just because they had a white mother.
What makes a mixed race child 'white'just because one of its parents is? Any more than they are 'black'.
Seems to me race is more what you identify with;whether it comes from colour or ethnicity.
If anyone looks at photoes of these children-they are about the same skin colour of their Aunts and Uncles-just possibly a shade lighter-this may be due to the fact their mother was 'white'.
Doesnt make them'white'
If anyone compares a photo of Michael at the same age as the eldest son-they are almost identical-bar the hair.
Michael had an afro, As both his parents were Afro American;its no surprise!
But Prince-has the same large wide eyes his father had and the same generous lips .
His nose is a little thinner-possibly due to his mothers influence.
But his sister resembles her aunts-they all have small noses and only diference is her blue eyes-probably also the legacy of her mother.
The littlest one looks very much like his big brother; same large eyes and round face.
Except his hair;altho straight is lustrous and black;while the others have thinner dark brown hair that will probably turn amost black as they age;like many Aussie kids who start off blonde as tinies.
I dont know definitely who the biofather is-but damn sure they look a whole lot like Michael at that age |
|
By: peaceleo69
11/07/2009
1:39 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| hiya winks-take care and look forward to seeing you here again.Stay safe-cheers |
|
By: lindabelinda40
11/07/2009
2:46 am |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: lokikane
11/07/2009
7:59 am |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
