By: dallone.ranger
30/06/2009
10:45 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Michael Jackson's kids look white, not part black.
His parents are claiming them, they are black.
Wonder where the kids want to go. |
|
By: shir2lou
30/06/2009
11:04 pm Yahoo! Profile:
shir2lou Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
We always knew htat he wasn't the father. The children have no negroid features at all.
It's very sad for the children I think. The grandparents and the mother are only interested in the money |
|
By: galloping.gerty
30/06/2009
11:15 pm Yahoo! Profile:
galloping.gerty Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Keep up.
Their biological mother gave an interview the other day, stating that Jackson was not their father.
The mother was inseminated with sperm from an anonymous donor. |
|
By: galloping.gerty
30/06/2009
11:16 pm Yahoo! Profile:
galloping.gerty Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
What do you care anyway?
You wanna adopt them and shower them with love and affection? |
|
By: wog.boy69
30/06/2009
11:47 pm Yahoo! Profile:
wog.boy69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
debbie rowe has not made any statement about the children.
the report about michael jackson being bald etc.. is FALSE (the coroner said that what the sun newspaper reported is false)
michael jacksons personal trainer (the guy who played the orginal hulk) said that michael jackson looked strong when they trained less than a month ago.
R.I.P Michael..
you seriously think katherine jacksons wants, needs or cares about michaels money?..geez..you don't know much at all do you... |
|
By: blossylyn
30/06/2009
11:54 pm Yahoo! Profile:
blossylyn Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
'Jackson's children aren't his', ex wife Deborah Rowe says
Michael Jackson's eldest children face an uncertain, bizarre future after their mother and his former wife Deborah Rowe reportedly confessed he is not their father.
It's been reported Rowe, the mother of Prince, 12, and Paris, 11, told News of the World she was artificially inseminated by an anonymous donor.
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/newshome/5687999/jack son-children-arent-his-ex-wife-deborah-rowe-says/ |
|
By: wog.boy69
30/06/2009
11:58 pm Yahoo! Profile:
wog.boy69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"new's of the world"?... yeah..that paper is full of it!!
that's report is false. |
|
By: trandiode
1/07/2009
12:14 am Yahoo! Profile:
trandiode Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| With all the unreliable information that has been thrown around ad-hoc , I am only interested in the official autopsy report when it surfaces and any direct family quotes ! The rest is garbage ! |
|
By: peaceleo69
1/07/2009
12:56 am Yahoo! Profile:
peaceleo69 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Keep up.
Their biological mother gave an interview the other day, stating that Jackson was not their father.
The mother was inseminated with sperm from an anonymous donor.
><><
actually; the mother has cone out and denied she said that and it was false report-as was the false autopsy report.
Anything goes; if it sells! |
|
By: honeyfuggling
1/07/2009
4:34 am Yahoo! Profile:
honeyfuggling Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"We've learned Michael Jackson was not the biological father of any of his children. And Debbie Rowe is not the biological mother of the two kids she bore for Michael. All three children were conceived in vitro -- outside the womb.
Multiple sources deeply connected to the births tell us Michael was not the sperm donor for any of his kids. Debbie's eggs were not used. She was merely the surrogate, and paid well for her services in the births of Michael Jr. and Paris.
In the case of Prince Michael II (the youngest), we're told the surrogate was never told of the identity of the "receiving parent" -- Michael Jackson. Three days after Prince was born at Grossmont Hospital in San Diego County, Jackson's lawyer came to the hospital to pick the baby up and deliver him to Michael.
We do not know if Jackson chose the sperm or egg donors or if he even knew who they were."
Although Rowe is not the biological mother, it's not a slam dunk that she would lose a custody battle. This type of case has never been litigated in California courts. Since Rowe was married to Jackson when Michael Jr. and Paris were born, there's a presumption that she's the biological parent. That presumption can be rebutted by other evidence.
We know there are documents outlining the whole arrangement for the birth of all three kids. Nonetheless, it's still an open issue with the courts. |
|
By: honeyfuggling
1/07/2009
4:37 am Yahoo! Profile:
honeyfuggling Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"We've learned Michael Jackson never adopted his three children, even though he's not the biological father.
We broke the story that neither Jackson nor Debbie Rowe are the biological parents of Michael Jr. and Paris. And Michael was not the biological parent of Prince Michael II either.
Now here's the rub. We've learned Jackson never filed legal papers to adopt any of his children. Legal experts tell us Jackson would be presumed the father but it's not conclusive by any means.
As for why Jackson didn't formally adopt -- we're told at the time the kids were born there was no third party whom he believed would try and claim custody. For some reason, Jackson never thought Debbie Rowe would mount a custody challenge." |
|
By: honeyfuggling
1/07/2009
4:41 am Yahoo! Profile:
honeyfuggling Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Jackson's Dad Aced Out of Will
Michael Jackson signed a will in 2002 providing for his children and his mom, but leaving nothing to daddy Joe -- this according to the Wall Street Journal.
As we reported yesterday, attorney John Branca has the will and plans to file it with the court within 30 days of the singer's death. According to the will, Jackson reportedly left his estate -- estimated at $1 billion -- to his mother, three children and one or more charities.
As for why Joe was left out -- Jackson has said during his childhood his father beat him.
Michael Jackson's Net Worth Revealed
Despite massive debt, Michael Jackson still claimed to have a net worth of $200 million, this according to papers obtained by the AP.
As of March 31, 2007, the papers show Michael had $567.6 million in assets -- which includes Neverland Ranch and his share of the Sony/ATV Music Publishing catalog (which includes the rights to songs by the Beatles) -- but his net worth was listed as $236 million.
The docs show Neverland was valued at $33 million and the publishing catalog was worth a whopping $390 million. |
|
By: aszure4ever
1/07/2009
4:51 am Yahoo! Profile:
aszure4ever Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
>>What do you care anyway?
You wanna adopt them and shower them with love and affection?<<
HEE hee
(that's a MJ heehee) |
|
By: frenchyjen70
1/07/2009
6:42 am Yahoo! Profile:
frenchyjen70 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| i read she is not interested in seeking custody? |
|
By: madaroma24
1/07/2009
7:02 am Yahoo! Profile:
madaroma24 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
He looked after these children, it's only right that they are with his family.
I am sure that they don't care what colour skin they have.
only racists worry about such cr@p. |
|
By: aszure4ever
1/07/2009
7:28 am Yahoo! Profile:
aszure4ever Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Frenchy, I heard that she willingly gave the children to Michael because , she said she was not good as a mother with children, and only did it for Michael. I suspect also, that she did it for the money, or, that was part of it (?)
I think she just does not want these children in the hands of Joe Jackson, and used, as a commodoty, for money and whatever. I wonder if she really does have Michaels wishes at heart, and the welfare of the children. I hope so. |
|
By: prince.canberra
1/07/2009
7:39 am Yahoo! Profile:
prince.canberra Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/30/fact-or-fiction -michael-jackson-rumours/
The allegation: MJ autopsy results released
On Monday British Tabloid The Sun announced that it had received a copy of the coroners autopsy of Michael Jackson. It seems the star was in pretty bad shape. The Sun explained that Jackson was 'a virtual skeleton' at the time of his death'barely eating and with only pills in his stomach at the time he died. His hips, thighs and shoulders were riddled with needle wounds believed to be the result of injections of narcotic painkillers, given three times a day for years.' The report also alleged that Jackson bore scars from at least 13 separate cosmetic operations, that 'little more than peach fuzz' covered his scalp, and that he showed symptoms of anorexia.'
The verdict: FALSE
The Suns report was a fake, says entertainment site TMZ (who broke the news of Michael Jackson's death).
The Los Angeles County coroner made this announcement on Monday: 'The report that is being published did not come from this office. I don't know where the information came from or who that information came from. It is not accurate. Some of it is totally false.' |
|
By: prince.canberra
1/07/2009
7:42 am Yahoo! Profile:
prince.canberra Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
The allegation: Michael Jackson is NOT Debbie Rowes baby daddy.
Perez Hilton and other celeb bloggers made reference this week to an interview with Debbie Rowe in which she admitted that her late ex husband Michael Jackson was not the father of their children. Rowe allegedly explained: 'I was just the vessel. It wasn't Michael's sperm. Just like I stick the sperm up my horse, this is what they did to me. I was his thoroughbred.'
The Verdict: FALSE Kind of
Tuesday, Perez and the others took it all back after Rowe's attorney, Marta Almli revealed that the interview was a fake. 'The interview did not occur' Almli explained. 'The article is a complete fabrication.'
So Jackson is the father, after all! Not quite. TMZ reported Tuesday that neither Jackson nor Rowe are the biological parents of Michael Jr., Paris and Prince Michael II. Apparently, all three children were conceived in vitro outside the womb. And Rowes eggs were allegedly not used. The article did not speculate as to whether Jackson chose sperm or egg donors personally. |
|
By: prince.canberra
1/07/2009
7:43 am Yahoo! Profile:
prince.canberra Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
LOL
what to believe
omg ...... i will be bothered by this for eternity!! |
|
By: aszure4ever
1/07/2009
7:44 am Yahoo! Profile:
aszure4ever Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
That 'newspaper' is a *Tabloid.....a thing like the National Enquiror.
The very type of false sensationalism crap that Farrah Fawcett was fighting against.
They will print whatever sells. |
|
By: aszure4ever
1/07/2009
7:46 am Yahoo! Profile:
aszure4ever Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
>> British Tabloid The Sun <<
That 'newspaper' is a *Tabloid.....a thing like the National Enquiror.
The very type of false sensationalism crap that Farrah Fawcett was fighting against.
They will print whatever sells. |
|
By: prince.canberra
1/07/2009
7:48 am Yahoo! Profile:
prince.canberra Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
but but, i NEED to know the truth so i can rabble on about it like i know all and knew mj and all his business,
like others here do ....i feel sooooooooo left out
please please i'm begging them to tell us the truth |
|
By: aszure4ever
1/07/2009
8:00 am Yahoo! Profile:
aszure4ever Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
LOL, I see your point, Prince.C
Peaceleo has printed lots of links in the other thread here in TS....take a look there.
I read myself, somewhere, that the 'bald' thing, and all that horrid stuff, was all a lie.....and, knowing the tabloids, they would print what MJ haters would love to thrive on.
Did you watch Farrah's story?......She managed to stop them from blabbing about her, it was quite a fight.....she was so brave. |
|
By: prince.canberra
1/07/2009
8:09 am Yahoo! Profile:
prince.canberra Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
no, i missed the farrah story, but sounds good she was able to shut these tabloid fools down, very good
they all need a good thumping for the rubbish and lies they print |
|
By: busybee6461
1/07/2009
8:09 am Yahoo! Profile:
busybee6461 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| These children have lost their father..the person who has been there constantly throughout their lives..very ssad for them..who cares if they are black..white or a bright shade of purple..they are children grieving..poor kids. |
|
