By: ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com
19/09/2008
10:16 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
There are enough unanswered questions about 9/11 to make the world seriously sceptical of the "offical" version.
I just don't understand why the American government is called upon to explain all the inconsistencies.
The 9/11 inquiry report pretty much just gives the information we've heard on the news in chronological order. It says Mr. X hijacked the plane at 10.20 am yaddah yaddah yaddah, but NOWHERE does it say how they know all this or what evidence was ever recovered.
The Russians have doubts. The French have doubts. I'm thinking anyone with more than half a brain has doubts. But no one is ever going to call upon the US government to explain itself. No one has the cahones for that. |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:16 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<I am not in the business of false flag attacks. I'm sure that those who are, are very good at their jobs.>
your motto is "I want to believe..." facts be damned! |
|
By: stop_the_war_today
19/09/2008
10:19 pm Yahoo! Profile:
stop_the_war_today Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
By the Staff of American Free Press
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, has told Italyâs oldest and most widely read newspaper that the 9-11 terrorist attacks were run by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge among global intelligence agencies. In what translates awkwardly into English, Cossiga told the newspaper Corriere della Sera:
âAll the [intelligence services] of America and Europeâ¦know well that the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the Mossad, with the aid of the Zionist world in order to put under accusation the Arabic countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part ⦠in Iraq [and] Afghanistan.â
Cossiga was elected president of the Italian Senate in July 1983 before winning a landslide election to become president of the country in 1985, and he remained until 1992.
Cossigaâs tendency to be outspoken upset the Italian political establishment, and he was forced to resign after revealing the existence of, and his part in setting up, Operation Gladio. This was a rogue intelligence network under NATO auspices that carried out bombings across Europe in the 1960s, 1970s and â80s. Gladioâs specialty was to carry out what they termed âfalse flagâ operationsâterror attacks that were blamed on their domestic and geopolitical opposition. |
|
By: stop_the_war_today
19/09/2008
10:19 pm Yahoo! Profile:
stop_the_war_today Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
In March 2001, Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra stated, in sworn testimony, âYou had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple: to force ⦠the public to turn to the state to ask for greater security.â
Cossiga first expressed his doubts about 9-11 in 2001, and is quoted by 9-11 researcherWebster Tarpley saying âThe mastermind of the attack must have been a sophisticated mind, provided with ample means not only to recruit fanatic kamikazes, but also highly specialized personnel. I add one thing: it could not be accomplished without infiltrations in the radar and
flight security personnel.â
Coming from a widely respected former head of state, Cossigaâs assertion that the 9-11 attacks were an inside job and that this is common knowledge among global intelligence agencies is illuminating. It is one more eye-opening confirmation that has not been mentioned by Americaâs propaganda machine in print or on TV. Nevertheless, because of his experience and status in the world, Cossiga cannot be discounted as a crackpot. |
|
By: kratos500027
19/09/2008
10:21 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kratos500027 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"your motto is "I want to believe..." facts be damned!"
Your motto is "The governments good... facts be damned!" |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
of course the US govt is covering up things. there was nodoubts lots of embarrassing secrets in the WTC and in all the detail of their failure to protect their people. They are making sure people dont get to know the extent of their incompetence.
That's a big big huge distance from 911 being an inside job. simple logic would dictate that the more credible alternative is that alqueda did it that to belive hundreds of US citizens did the deed secretly and have revealed it to no-one. no regrets, no suicides, no change-of heart. nothing. Not plausible. |
|
By: stop_the_war_today
19/09/2008
10:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
stop_the_war_today Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| More 9/11 evidence has surfaced indicating explosions rocked the North Tower prior to the jetliner striking the top floors. Transit Authority conversations between motormen and dispatchers reveal a âheavy smoke situationâ on transit line's 1 and 9 adjacent to and in the sublevel basement area near the North Tower just minutes before the jetliner strike. The obscure tapes, unknown until recently discovered in official transit authority transcripts and released in the Transit Authority News, adds further credibility to the numerous eye-witness claiming to have heard explosions rock the North Tower prior to the jetliner strike. |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:23 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<"your motto is "I want to believe..." facts be damned!"
Your motto is "The governments good... facts be damned!">
the balance of probability alone discounts your assertions. logic destroys in and facts fail to support you. |
|
By: kratos500027
19/09/2008
10:24 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kratos500027 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
" no regrets, no suicides, no change-of heart. nothing. Not plausible."
How would you ever know? |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<More 9/11 evidence has surfaced indicating explosions rocked the North Tower prior to the jetliner striking the top floors. Transit Authority conversations between motormen and dispatchers reveal a �heavy smoke situation� on transit line's 1 and 9 adjacent to and in the sublevel basement area near the North Tower just minutes before the jetliner strike. The obscure tapes, unknown until recently discovered in official transit authority transcripts and released in the Transit Authority News, adds further credibility to the numerous eye-witness claiming to have heard explosions rock the North Tower prior to the jetliner strike.>
The US agents could get all this set up but couldnt manage to set off the explosions at the right time (as the plane hits )?
you are dumber than I thought if you cant see the logical difficulty in that. |
|
By: stop_the_war_today
19/09/2008
10:26 pm Yahoo! Profile:
stop_the_war_today Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Ever since Sept. 11, 2001, there have been questions about Flight 93, the ill-fated plane that crashed in the rural fields of Pennsylvania. The official story has been that passengers on the United Airlines flight rushed the hijackers in an effort to prevent them from crashing the plane into a strategic target â possibly the U.S. Capitol. During his surprise Christmas Eve trip to Iraq, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld referred to the flight being shot down â long a suspicion because of the danger the flight posed to Washington landmarks and population centers. Was it a slip of the tongue? Or was it the truth finally being dropped on the public? |
|
By: the_multiple_id_user
19/09/2008
10:27 pm Yahoo! Profile:
the_multiple_id_user Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"SOMEONE SOMEWHERE would talk "
not sure about that,i mean if i had been involved i wouldnt be admitting it. |
|
By: kratos500027
19/09/2008
10:27 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kratos500027 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| How long do you think they were planning this? |
|
By: ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com
19/09/2008
10:27 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Wonder if it's coincidental that a few people involved have turned up dead.... supposedly from suicide? |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:28 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<" no regrets, no suicides, no change-of heart. nothing. Not plausible."
How would you ever know?>
NOONE has ever leaked anything nor even hinted at it. that is simply not plausible in an operation of this size. you dont know human nature if you really think that citizens of a country like that could pull of an act of audacious murder on a grand scale and then slink back to their jobs as if nothing had happened.
That is beyond credibility given what happened at the time and since. |
|
By: ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com
19/09/2008
10:28 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"How long do you think they were planning this?"
since the 60s |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:29 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<"SOMEONE SOMEWHERE would talk "
not sure about that,i mean if i had been involved i wouldnt be admitting it.>
not even a death-bed confession? a religious experience? a drunken night out? |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:31 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<Wonder if it's coincidental that a few people involved have turned up dead.... supposedly from suicide?>
if u had been part of the group charged with protecting the country from terrorists and u messed up onthis scale you might want to kill yourself too. Nonetheless a few suicides prove nothing on their own without context. suicide occure every day but are only noteworthy when you can draw an unjustified inference about it. |
|
By: longweekend58
19/09/2008
10:32 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<"How long do you think they were planning this?"
since the 60s>
The WTC wasnt even built until the 70s. want to try again? |
|
By: ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com
19/09/2008
10:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"you really think that citizens of a country like that could pull of an act of audacious murder on a grand scale and then slink back to their jobs as if nothing had happened."
What if the towers had never collapsed?
What if the towers weren't supposed to collapse?
The twin towers had previously been bombed by Muslim terrorists. How symbolic. But, when they were rebuilt, they were supposedly built to withstand a terrorist bomb blast.
If the towers hadn't collapsed, the death toll would have been much MUCH less. It was early in the morning. The upper floors weren't overly populated (and most of them were foreign companies anyway.... we all know how the far right feels about that).
So...... what IF the towers hadn't collapsed and only a handful of people were meant to die and that collateral damage had been mostly foreign nationals?
Given that it turned out differently, who would have the courage to speak out? NO ONE! That's who.
Furthermore, the whole synchronised plane crashes into various landmarks is just a bit too Hollywood blockbuster for the "bomb-in-the-back-pack" set.
The logistics of it were WAY beyond any normal terrorist operation.
But, people still have so much faith in their society, don't they?
The majority of people are never going to believe that their own nationals could do this to their own country.
Don't mind that the US experimented on its own people with agent orange and nerve gas. Don't mind that they wanted to gas 200 Australian soldiers with nerve gas in the 60s... just to see what would happen.
To admit your own government or allies does not value the life of your own people would be a reality that most people just can't accommodate into their tiny brains. It would cause them to melt down.
The Muslims did not do 9/11. I'd bet money on it. |
|
By: whoru_returns
19/09/2008
10:36 pm |
Message deleted. |
|
By: ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com
19/09/2008
10:37 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"
The WTC wasnt even built until the 70s. want to try again?"
That wasn't the specific target...but the scenario of a false attack was the subject of a very real US government plan.
Google is your friend. Go and search for it. I'm too tired to spoon feed you tonight. |
|
By: ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com
19/09/2008
10:38 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ydontpeoplethink@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Operation North Woods.... northwoods..... something like that.
Declassified military papers.
Go look for yourself. |
|
By: ripfelix
19/09/2008
10:41 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ripfelix Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"coincidences "
Now, theres hard evidence.
I was born on a Friday and its Friday today, now theres a coincidence. |
|
By: whoru_returns
19/09/2008
10:42 pm |
Message deleted. |
|
