By: milf01@y7mail.com
16/07/2008
11:11 am |
Message deleted. |
|
By: milf01@y7mail.com
16/07/2008
11:13 am Yahoo! Profile:
milf01@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
she is a very lucky girl not to be executed, she should think herself lucky
its all about accountabilty,
DRUGS IN INDONESIA = DEATH...
SHE IS LUCKY
N O T A VICTIM |
|
By: blackwaterice
16/07/2008
11:17 am Yahoo! Profile:
blackwaterice Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
If a foreigner was jailed for smuggling drugs into Australia, and Australian authorities deliberately contaminated the evidence and did NO investigation, then the other country would have every right to be outraged at Australia. Australians would be outraged too!
Don't try to use that argument. It is completely pointless and you all know it. |
|
By: interested173
16/07/2008
11:38 am Yahoo! Profile:
interested173 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| As a young child I was bought up to believe everyone deserved " a fair go" it was an Aussie motto. Schapelle Corby and her family have not been given a fair go. Not by the Indo government nor our own government, nor the press/media, nor by her fellow countryman. |
|
By: shan98_2000
16/07/2008
11:53 am |
Message deleted. |
|
By: caulfield.king
16/07/2008
12:06 pm Yahoo! Profile:
caulfield.king Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
, and Australian authorities deliberately contaminated the evidence and did NO investigation
Nothing more then assumptions |
|
By: blackwaterice
16/07/2008
1:55 pm Yahoo! Profile:
blackwaterice Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Assumptions? Sorry, it is fact. Have you never seen the photos of them mishandling the evidence?
Who was Schapelle taking the drugs to?
Why didn't the Indonesians investigate the "network of tourist shops" where the marijuana was to be sold? Why haven't they arrested anyone else for their involvement? |
|
By: blackwaterice
16/07/2008
1:56 pm Yahoo! Profile:
blackwaterice Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| interested173 - the "fair go" is well and truly dead. In fact, it's quite the opposite these days. |
|
By: slowdriver_08
16/07/2008
2:17 pm Yahoo! Profile:
slowdriver_08 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Bambu/slowdriver just cannt accept that Corby is guilty,
_________________________ _________________________ ______
Yes he can, but he hasn't seen concrete evidence that SHE herself is guilty. |
|
By: slowdriver_08
16/07/2008
2:18 pm Yahoo! Profile:
slowdriver_08 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| The cops are running the drug trade. |
|
By: ausgal951753
16/07/2008
2:21 pm Yahoo! Profile:
ausgal951753 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
The family of schappel sell drugs, grew drug, Mecedes used drugs to enhance her sexual appetite for all night sex, she admits this.
Schappel probably did the same but she is better looking than mercedes so probably got better men easier than her sister.
Guilty yes, but 20 years for wacky backy is a bit steep. |
|
By: blackwaterice
16/07/2008
3:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
blackwaterice Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
ausgal - where is the evidence of Schapelle's family growing and selling drugs? Evidence does not include hearsay from druggies who have been discredited by police and/or supreme court.
And that part about Mercedes was alleged by Jodie Power. Mercedes didn't admit to it.
Tip - if you want to put forward an argument, it might help to get your facts straight. |
|
By: hallacba
16/07/2008
3:26 pm Yahoo! Profile:
hallacba Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
the "evidence" should have been forensic tested
but it wasn't
thats shows a corrupt justice how they can put someone away for 20 yrs without forensic evidence |
|
By: m.ihryh@y7mail.com
16/07/2008
3:40 pm |
Message deleted. |
|
By: gia.gloria2001
16/07/2008
3:49 pm Yahoo! Profile:
gia.gloria2001 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
hmm I think I lost a topic hehe ~ anyway from that link /article ~ excellent.
http://www.cla.asn.au/0805/index.php/opinion/2008/ 07/10/on-trial-australian-media-for-underminin
As an Australian-trainer lawyer and a keen observer of the Indonesian judicial system, my position on the Corby case is a simple one that is probably shared by anyone who has honestly followed the case. Corby is being unjustly imprisoned for a crime that was NEVER PROPERLY INVESTIGATED. The drugs were destroyed before they could be tested for origin.
The bag in which they were contained was never checked for fingerprints. Airport CCTV scans were wiped. There is no corroborating evidence in the case whatsoever aside from the drugs in the bag and that is not enough to put someone away for 20 years where considerable doubt exists. |
|
By: wearetwofatfarmers
16/07/2008
3:53 pm Yahoo! Profile:
wearetwofatfarmers Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| shes in prison why bother with her shes been found guilty.. |
|
By: andreihicks
16/07/2008
4:20 pm Yahoo! Profile:
andreihicks Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| She's not Australia's problem. |
|
By: interested173
16/07/2008
4:23 pm Yahoo! Profile:
interested173 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Then who's problem is she. She is an Australian. |
|
By: daveontheboards
16/07/2008
4:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
daveontheboards Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Then who's problem is she.
Her own. Do the crime do the time. |
|
By: interested173
16/07/2008
4:27 pm Yahoo! Profile:
interested173 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| BUT now we get back to ........... Did she do the crime?????????????????? |
|
By: m.ihryh@y7mail.com
16/07/2008
4:33 pm |
Message deleted. |
|
By: daveontheboards
16/07/2008
4:34 pm Yahoo! Profile:
daveontheboards Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Did she do the crime??????????????????
And around and around we go, where we stop no one knows. |
|
By: gia.gloria2001
16/07/2008
4:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
gia.gloria2001 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
What else were you thinking "forensic testing" of corbys drug would show ??
http://www.cla.asn.au/0805/index.php/opinion/2008/ 07/10/on-trial-australian -media-for-underminin
"The drugs were destroyed before they could be tested for origin." |
|
By: bhunnostar
16/07/2008
4:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
bhunnostar Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| The Pub??? |
|
By: gia.gloria2001
16/07/2008
4:37 pm Yahoo! Profile:
gia.gloria2001 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200601/s15584 53.htm
Forensic testing
Sources close to the AFP who have viewed photographs of the cannabis found inside Schapelle Corby's boogie-board bag support the view that it is most likely to be hydroponically grown.
Simon Gilmore, a forensic researcher who has been working with the Australian Federal Police on cannabis DNA identification, says two samples of marijuana could be DNA matched.
"There are a couple of conditions that would have to be met. As I mentioned before you need a comparison sample," he said.
"You may have a sample from the cannabis that was seized in Bali and then if you suspected it came from a particular individual, if they had some cannabis in their possession, you would be able to do a DNA comparison of that cannabis with the cannabis seized in Bali."
But a DNA comparison is unlikely to happen. The Australian Federal Police has told the ABC's investigative unit that when the AFP offered to forensically test Schapelle Corby's boogie-board bag and its contents, her lawyers rejected the offer.
When the Australian Federal Police explained to Schapelle Corby's lawyers that any result from the testing for fingerprints inside the bag or DNA testing of the marijuana would also be passed on to the Indonesian police, her lawyers declined the offer to carry out the tests. |
|
