By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
7:51 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: slowdriver_08
6/06/2008
7:52 pm Yahoo! Profile:
slowdriver_08 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I personally did see much artistic merit in the pictures... but they ARE NOT pornography
_________________________ ___________________
Playboy is soft porn.
Some of the photos are nude 'Playboy' shots...soft porn.
Simple...game over, end of story.
The DPP would've won. |
|
By: gibbot5000
6/06/2008
7:52 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
7:53 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: markus5006
6/06/2008
7:53 pm Yahoo! Profile:
markus5006 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"The DPP would've won."
its about context. if youd ever studied art your understand the difference between playboy and portraiture.. |
|
By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
7:56 pm Yahoo! Profile:
antiviruscosican Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"The DPP would've won."
its about context. if youd ever studied art your understand the difference between playboy and portraiture..
Do you get paid to do that??? |
|
By: kjm08@y7mail.com
6/06/2008
7:57 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kjm08@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Markus, some parents are idiots just becasue they give permission does not make it right, would you argue this if the parents gave permission for their child to be photographed in a sexually explicit way . I don't see these photos as porn but do wonder if they are appropriate. Couldn't Henson have made his "artistic" point with clothed children |
|
By: kjm08@y7mail.com
6/06/2008
7:58 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kjm08@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| and no I don't have a problem with nudity |
|
By: greatgranswisdom
6/06/2008
8:00 pm Yahoo! Profile:
greatgranswisdom Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<<<Some of the photos are nude 'Playboy' shots...>>>
I must admit to never seeing a copy of "Playboy" ....bambu.
So with you're obvious, well referenced expertise on the subject....the model's poses and facial expressions in the "Playboy" magazine, are similar to Henson's photo's in question? |
|
By: markus5006
6/06/2008
8:04 pm Yahoo! Profile:
markus5006 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Markus, some parents are idiots just becasue they give permission does not make it right, would you argue this if the parents gave permission for their child to be photographed in a sexually explicit way"
but these arent sexually explicit pictures?
the guy is an artist/phtographer not a pornographer..
anyone who sees these pics as "sexually explicit" needs to see a therapist about thier "issues" |
|
By: markus5006
6/06/2008
8:05 pm Yahoo! Profile:
markus5006 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Do you get paid to do that???"
to study art? mno I didnt...
you have a real problem with "context" dont you?
are KMART catalogues "child porn" there are pics of children in them in various stages of dress... some even in underwear!! |
|
By: buzzanddidj
6/06/2008
8:05 pm Yahoo! Profile:
buzzanddidj Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
'Couldn't Henson have made his "artistic" point with clothed children'
By: kjm08@y7mail.com
He has DONE this
Most of his work does not include the human form, let alone naked versions
Those that DO are a long way from graphic
A selection of the cancelled exhibition....
http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/artists/18/Bill_Hen son/
. |
|
By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
8:06 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: kjm08@y7mail.com
6/06/2008
8:08 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kjm08@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Markus, again you miss the point, you argue that because parents gave permission it is ok, i don't share your faith in all parents |
|
By: greatgranswisdom
6/06/2008
8:08 pm Yahoo! Profile:
greatgranswisdom Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
However, I established that one of my personal friends possessed a copy of the publication "Playgirl".
As Henson also photographed males....are you familiar with this publication bambu....are the images of males also similar to Henson's? |
|
By: markus5006
6/06/2008
8:09 pm Yahoo! Profile:
markus5006 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"'Couldn't Henson have made his "artistic" point with clothed children'"
jeez anyone would think all this guy does it take pics of kids
its about light, contrast and form...
philistines.. |
|
By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
8:09 pm Yahoo! Profile:
antiviruscosican Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
are KMART catalogues "child porn" there are pics of children in them in various stages of dress... some even in underwear!!
Yes not in the nude
your point is
or maybe you just like nids to be naked |
|
By: kjm08@y7mail.com
6/06/2008
8:10 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kjm08@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| buzz, then why add the photos of nude children? |
|
By: markus5006
6/06/2008
8:10 pm Yahoo! Profile:
markus5006 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"I think sickos like mark and gobbo should start familys and then see how they feel about it then"
and I think people like you shouldnt breed... |
|
By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
8:11 pm Yahoo! Profile:
antiviruscosican Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
are you familiar with this publication bambu
NOT HERE |
|
By: markus5006
6/06/2008
8:11 pm Yahoo! Profile:
markus5006 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"your point is"
my point is context.. something oyu obviously have problems addressing..
if a "sicko" gets aroused by a KMART catalogue... does that make it porn?
simple question... |
|
By: reidsays
6/06/2008
8:11 pm Yahoo! Profile:
reidsays Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
kim...."Markus, some parents are idiots just becasue they give permission does not make it right, would you argue this if the parents gave permission for their child to be photographed in a sexually explicit way . I don't see these photos as porn but do wonder if they are appropriate. Couldn't Henson have made his "artistic" point with clothed children"
with 1 in 6 females violated as children...are they to ignore it and carry on as if they nothing of the perversion of certain adults???
perhaps the pictures depict the looming shadow of perversion that hovers over the young and innocent development of their bodies???? |
|
By: kjm08@y7mail.com
6/06/2008
8:12 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kjm08@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Markus, why does he need naked children to show his use of light, contrast and form?
Philistine no not me, but thanks for the constructive insult. Trying to understand Hensons motives maybe, wondering why he needed to photograph naked children, absolutely |
|
By: antiviruscosican
6/06/2008
8:12 pm Yahoo! Profile:
antiviruscosican Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
and I think people like you shouldnt breed...
If we could breed sickos like you out the world would be a nicer place |
|
By: reidsays
6/06/2008
8:12 pm Yahoo! Profile:
reidsays Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| should read...."with 1 in 6 females violated as children...are they to ignore it and carry on as if they KNOW nothing of the perversion of certain adults???" |
|
