By: emucorp 23/05/2008 4:12 pm Yahoo! Profile: emucorp Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Like I said, I can't articulate it properly at this point."
Yes well I know why you can't. It's because my response was every bit as silly and facile as the post I was responding to. I was simply illustrating the over-simplification of using the principle of "democracy" to provide carte blanche to "expression". |
|
By: buzzanddidj 23/05/2008 4:12 pm Yahoo! Profile: buzzanddidj Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
THESE people should be prosocuted....
http://au.news.yahoo.com//080523/2/16z6j.html |
|
By: plotrick1 23/05/2008 4:13 pm Yahoo! Profile: plotrick1 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
*Yes well I know why you can't. It's because my response was every bit as silly and facile as the post I was responding to. I was simply illustrating the over-simplification of using the principle of "democracy" to provide carte blanche to "expression".*
That's reassuring. Although Friday-Afternoon-Brain probably has something to do with it as well. |
|
By: emucorp 23/05/2008 4:13 pm Yahoo! Profile: emucorp Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Aaaah . Feedback polls."
Never fear I am going to exhaustively interview every person in Australia over the weekend. Meantime I'll go with the data I can collect vs your sample of one as to what the "majority" might think on this subject. |
|
By: cheeky_dee_au 23/05/2008 4:15 pm Yahoo! Profile: cheeky_dee_au Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Has anyone on this board actually seen the exhibition in its entirety?"
Exactly.
How are we to form opinion on what we don't know? how can one say it is child porn by simply associating the words naked and girl together.
WE DON'T KNOW. I find it rather interesting that so many people have their knickers in a knot over something they haven't actually seen.
For all we know, the pictures could be beautiful and innocent, or they could in fact be quite repulsive, but really it is all speculation and hot air. |
|
By: urbaniteshaz 23/05/2008 4:16 pm Yahoo! Profile: urbaniteshaz Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
like i said before longweekend,
go read the book DAMAGED by Cathy Glass
it'll turn you right off anything that encourage these rock spiders as a parent it will reduce you to tears and haunt you for the rest of your days. And please don't feel that in any of my comments i have meant to attack your role as a loving parent that is not my intention. |
|
By: longweekend58 23/05/2008 4:17 pm Yahoo! Profile: longweekend58 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<WE DON'T KNOW. I find it rather interesting that so many people have their knickers in a knot over something they haven't actually seen.
For all we know, the pictures could be beautiful and innocent, or they could in fact be quite repulsive, but really it is all speculation and hot air.>
And therein lies the problem. very few actually CARE about the facts as long as they can get hysterical. |
|
By: chocfudge_baby 23/05/2008 4:17 pm Yahoo! Profile: chocfudge_baby Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Actually you could see the top half of the photos on Yahoo.au website before they changed the photo to police at the front of the gallery.
It showed a young looking preteen (in my eyes) fully naked with her face blurred out.
That's what got my "knickers in a knot" |
|
By: mr_rekshun 23/05/2008 4:17 pm Yahoo! Profile: mr_rekshun Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
>>How are we to form opinion on what we don't know? how can one say it is child porn by simply associating the words naked and girl together.>>
Easy to tell wghat's porn. Nipples.
If there weren't nipples, there wouldn't be a problem. Isn't it funny how a little pink circle can create so much fuss? |
|
By: chocfudge_baby 23/05/2008 4:19 pm Yahoo! Profile: chocfudge_baby Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
http://au.news.yahoo.com/080523/21/16z73.html
Just because the photo is black and white, does not make it artistic. |
|
By: darkhall67 23/05/2008 4:20 pm Yahoo! Profile: darkhall67 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Never fear I am going to exhaustively interview every person in Australia over the weekend. Meantime I'll go with the data I can collect vs your sample of one as to what the "majority" might think on this subject. >>
------------------
That would be appreciated .
It might produce a more accurate reflection of australian attitudes than "feedback" polls on talkback radio ,or yahoo polls.
While you're at it , can you ask everyone if they think the majority is always right?
Thanks in advance. |
|
By: longweekend58 23/05/2008 4:22 pm Yahoo! Profile: longweekend58 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<like i said before longweekend,
go read the book DAMAGED by Cathy Glass
it'll turn you right off anything that encourage these rock spiders as a parent it will reduce you to tears and haunt you for the rest of your days. And please don't feel that in any of my comments i have meant to attack your role as a loving parent that is not my intention.>
I dont need to read another book to know the damage caused by sexual predators but your very post unlines the problem I am repeating. AS soon as the words naked and girl are used together people bring out 'predator' and 'paedophile' etc. Thats a knee-jerk reaction - not considered thought. Do you really want a world where everyone is afraid to own a camera in case a child accidentally comes in frame? Do you want a world where advertisment for childrens clothes has to use text not drawings or pictures? One american moron A-G actually suggested that ALL photos of children be banned and possession of them be a criminal offence. THIS IS WAHT WE ARE FIGHTING. sometimes the battle lines are drawn in odd places. We, (ie thinking, non-hysterical people), dont want to fight that kind of legislation so we say NOW that such exhibits are not porn. It may not be to your taste (and it isnt to mine) but that's not the point. Freedom is removed by degrees and before you know it we wil end up in a situation like what I described. |
|
By: cheeky_dee_au 23/05/2008 4:22 pm Yahoo! Profile: cheeky_dee_au Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Damn those nipples.
So any pics of me breastfeeding could possibly be considered mild porn?
I forgot that nipples were all sexual and for pervy pleasure. |
|
By: hallacba 23/05/2008 4:23 pm Yahoo! Profile: hallacba Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
no one here actually cares about what the girl in the photo wants
everyone wants to jump on the band wagon |
|
By: emucorp 23/05/2008 4:23 pm Yahoo! Profile: emucorp Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"While you're at it , can you ask everyone if they think the majority is always right?"
You'd be better off leaving that task to someone trying to base their feeble argument on the notion that we live in a "democracy" and that ergo anything goes. |
|
By: longweekend58 23/05/2008 4:24 pm Yahoo! Profile: longweekend58 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<Just because the photo is black and white, does not make it artistic.>
nor does a photo being nude necesarrily make it pornographic. |
|
By: darkhall67 23/05/2008 4:24 pm Yahoo! Profile: darkhall67 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
no one here actually cares about what the girl in the photo wants
everyone wants to jump on the band wagon >>
------------------------- --
I gather the girl gave her consent in consultation with her parents. |
|
By: longweekend58 23/05/2008 4:25 pm Yahoo! Profile: longweekend58 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<You'd be better off leaving that task to someone trying to base their feeble argument on the notion that we live in a "democracy" and that ergo anything goes.>
Whilst I see your point that actually IS what a democracy is about. |
|
By: darkhall67 23/05/2008 4:25 pm Yahoo! Profile: darkhall67 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
You'd be better off leaving that task to someone trying to base their feeble argument on the notion that we live in a "democracy" and that ergo anything goes. >>
---------------------
well that aint me. |
|
By: chocfudge_baby 23/05/2008 4:26 pm Yahoo! Profile: chocfudge_baby Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"no one here actually cares about what the girl in the photo wants"
And what does a 12-13 year old girl who had her photo taken while naked want? |
|
By: emucorp 23/05/2008 4:26 pm Yahoo! Profile: emucorp Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Whilst I see your point that actually IS what a democracy is about."
*sigh*
Well so if the "majority" of people that I interrogate over the weekend (21 million in all) don't like the pics, then will y'all shut up and go away? |
|
By: wtf_gf 23/05/2008 4:27 pm Yahoo! Profile: wtf_gf Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I have some point to make here. 1. The girl was 13 yr old not 18 not a bady either, the child was not leggaly able to make informed consent. Many people did see the picture and found it objectionable including a polition, which is why the photos were taken down.
I think nude photos of children who are in puberty is morally and ethically wrong. I have also known of paedephiles to become excited of pictures of young kids in underwear from catalogues as well.
I dont think the photos should have been put up |
|
By: emucorp 23/05/2008 4:27 pm Yahoo! Profile: emucorp Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"well that aint me."
Maybe ... but that was the point I was having a master debate about when your snout intruded. |
|
By: darkhall67 23/05/2008 4:28 pm Yahoo! Profile: darkhall67 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Well so if the "majority" of people that I interrogate over the weekend (21 million in all) don't like the pics, then will y'all shut up and go away? >>
-------------------------
Only if they also reply in the affirmative to the second question. |
|
By: darkhall67 23/05/2008 4:29 pm Yahoo! Profile: darkhall67 Did this message offend you? Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Maybe ... but that was the point I was having a master debate about when your snout intruded. >>
------------------
Well excuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuse meeeeeeee. |
|