By: mcc_alsom
23/05/2008
6:57 pm Yahoo! Profile:
mcc_alsom Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| OK, based purely upon the logic that Im reading in this topic, I would say that everyone who has ever watched a Huggies advertisement on TV is also a pedophile. |
|
By: bundyau
23/05/2008
6:58 pm Yahoo! Profile:
bundyau Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Yahoo! Profile:
rob665336
Did this message offend you?
Report abuse
Re:Prosecution over nude child photos ur ... Reply to this message
You really are no better than the filth that get locked up. Art my aunt gladys. Next you will tell that Picasso can realy paint
------------------------
The sad part is,he was a great painter in his early days.I agree with you on his main works |
|
By: buzzanddidj
23/05/2008
6:58 pm Yahoo! Profile:
buzzanddidj Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
'everyone who has ever watched a Huggies advertisement on TV is also a pedophile.'
I have the DVD box set under my bed |
|
By: johntillerstudent
23/05/2008
7:01 pm Yahoo! Profile:
johntillerstudent Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| This bloke, along with Germain Greer(Book call Boys) have been flying under the radar for 15 years producing porn images of minors for petifiles. They say that the images are to produce the feeling of delite not desire.Well delite can seen in Adults nudes images but they are really pushing the evolope of delite with this child porn. |
|
By: weed612001
23/05/2008
7:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
weed612001 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Hey reids you see that? You have just been called sick!! |
|
By: hallacba
23/05/2008
7:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
hallacba Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| whoever watches kids that are wearing less clothes is a potential child molester (except hallacba) |
|
By: pansi1951
23/05/2008
7:07 pm Yahoo! Profile:
pansi1951 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
If something's wrong out there, it is up to the adults to shout loud and clear. We have to have voices for the innocent children. Ignore it and it spreads like a cancer.
Strike while the iron is hot.
If those children asked to be photographed in the nude, I'll eat my hat. And if they didn't ask, they were coerced by adults.
I don't feel sorry for you people who wanted to look at these pics. Society has rules for the protection of the innocent, live with it. |
|
By: reidsays
23/05/2008
7:11 pm Yahoo! Profile:
reidsays Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"The minute this artist gets away with it (which he probably will) every sick pervert who is involved in child pornography will just slap the "art" tag on everything they do! Who's to judge the line between art and pornography? He should be made an example of...not made an excuse for all the other sick f#@ks!"
this was exactly my point earlier when the huge monoliths of the moralitists and the porn merchants clashed!!
in the middle were the feminists et al calling for a differentation between 'natural healthy sexuality' and 'perverted sexuality'!!!
in the end the rabid moralists destroyed that interpretation and look what porn followed!!!
healthy human sexuality MUST be defined....we are born nude and will remain nude if all the clothes suddenly disappeared...we procreate through two genders and that can be HEALTHY or UNHEALTHY!!!
the moralists seek all nudity as profane and all sexuality as profane!!!
where is the protection for the children??????
....the example has already occurred in the 70s...
and the result was snuff porn, kiddy porn...perverted sexuality!!!!
*sigh*......i KNOW i am not sick weed...so they must be
.....simple>>>????
obviously NOT from these threads:( |
|
By: buzzanddidj
23/05/2008
7:14 pm Yahoo! Profile:
buzzanddidj Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
'This bloke, along with Germain Greer(Book call Boys) have been flying under the radar for 15 years producing porn images of minors for petifiles.'
By: johntillerstudent
In case you are saving up to buy it, the book by Germaine Greer is titled 'The Boy', and is text, not pictures
Aside from the cover...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/images/05002380 9X/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=266239&s=books
. |
|
By: reidsays
23/05/2008
7:18 pm Yahoo! Profile:
reidsays Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
pansi..."I don't feel sorry for you people who wanted to look at these pics. Society has rules for the protection of the innocent, live with it."
"society has rules for the protection of the innocent"
ignorance and naivety doesn't help the children pansi:(
not all discussing another pov want to look at these pictures.....when your husband is arrested for picking up the photos of the kids in the bath that you took????? how would you view that????
those rules ar not being applied...the children are not being protected:(
this is a sham...you wait and see...it will pass thrpugh court and now 1000s will descend on the art gallery...if they don't make it through, it will be an example to placate the angry desperate voices of those trying for years to alter matters:(
child porn and sexualisation of children hasn't got the attention this case has.....
WHY WHY WHY!!!! |
|
By: rob665336
23/05/2008
7:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
rob665336 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Hey Buzza how many copies of Germaines book you gunna buy for the cover |
|
By: co1868
23/05/2008
7:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
co1868 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<<<OK, based purely upon the logic that Im reading in this topic, I would say that everyone who has ever watched a Huggies advertisement on TV is also a pedophile.>>>
Nothing logical about this comment. In fact, to make such a rediculous statement perhaps suggests you may have watched way too much of it yourself. Don't mean to be rude but to me your logic is up the creek. |
|
By: reidsays
23/05/2008
7:28 pm Yahoo! Profile:
reidsays Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
oh co1868...this is a highly emotive subject....but the Huggies commercial makes a point!!
there ARE men who abuse BABIES....as obscene as that could possibly be comprehended...that is fact:(
so why do not those commercials get banned and the producers not arrested???
after all the millions that view them would far exceed those who saw the photographic material? |
|
By: cheeky_dee_au
23/05/2008
7:31 pm Yahoo! Profile:
cheeky_dee_au Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Nothing logical about this comment. In fact, to make such a rediculous statement perhaps suggests you may have watched way too much of it yourself. Don't mean to be rude but to me your logic is up the creek."
I disagree. I think that this logic is very relevant in this topic and for those of us that can see the difference between nudity and sexuality most of the time, I think using such an extreme example is very fitting. Not all nudity is sexual. |
|
By: urbaniteshaz
23/05/2008
7:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
urbaniteshaz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| uh she's 12 yrs old |
|
By: co1868
23/05/2008
7:37 pm Yahoo! Profile:
co1868 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<<<Yes, but being a vegetarian these ad's don't make me hungry, just as not being a paedophile, these pictures are not going to stir up sexual feelings in me for a 13 year old.>>>
cheeky-dee when are you ever going to be able to comprehend anything other than your own self centeredness. And your comment is also stupid - either that or you are unable to comprehend what you read. You see the comment was not about YOU (sorry to hurt your ego) it was in regard to any paedophiles that may come alone to see the pics. It was like - you don't leave a heap of alcohol sitting around in your house if someone you know is an alcoholic is coming to visit or stay. Okay, so there's an add with all the new delicious dishes on offer at a vegetarian restaurant just down your street...
dah... think beyond your square box...
Sometimes I really think some people just type without a clue... |
|
By: cltc83
23/05/2008
7:40 pm Yahoo! Profile:
cltc83 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I have a daughter whom is 8 and i wouldnt let her get seen by anyone topless or in anyway nude and i think the parents and photographer should be chared, she is a minor and under the law cannot concent to being photographed nude so why should there be any pic's at all! |
|
By: cltc83
23/05/2008
7:40 pm Yahoo! Profile:
cltc83 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I have a daughter whom is 8 and i wouldnt let her get seen by anyone topless or in anyway nude and i think the parents and photographer should be charged, she is a minor and under the law cannot concent to being photographed nude so why should there be any pic's at all! |
|
By: longweekend58
23/05/2008
7:42 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<"It is the province of the small mind to attach evil motives to someone who disagrees with you.'
Comment was not directed at anyone long weekend. Generalisation of common defense only.
If any offence taken, it was not intended.>
I knew it wasnt directed personally, but that doesnt change my view that trying to attach evil motives to something you dont like or find offensive is in itself somewhat offensive. |
|
By: urbaniteshaz
23/05/2008
7:44 pm Yahoo! Profile:
urbaniteshaz Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| absolutley i have an 18 yr and 11 yr and i do my utmost to ensure their protection and innocence. i would never allow my 12 yr old to pose nude and would castrate any sicko who dared approach me with the idea, as this creep approached this model. my 18 yr old has the strongest respect for women and sees the photos as discraceful and highly inapropriate. |
|
By: pansi1951
23/05/2008
7:45 pm Yahoo! Profile:
pansi1951 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I've got nude pics of the kids in the bath, but I certainly won't be pinning them up in a public place for all to view. Their father would not get arrested for looking at them because he would be in his own home, not flashing them around the country.
I am neither ignorant or naive, nor am I a wowser. I have played on nude beaches myself. Consenting adults can do what they like, I couldn't care. My point is simply that children should be protected. That's why we have rules in society.
We can only voice our opinion on cases that get media attention. Child porn and sexual abuse cases go before the courts on a daily basis, I'm sure. We only hear after the fact, if we knew before the fact, of course we would have the same reaction.
Protect your children, don't let them run around on the beach without clothes. There are too many predators out there. Why tempt fate. |
|
By: co1868
23/05/2008
7:46 pm Yahoo! Profile:
co1868 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Reidsy I have never seen Huggies so I have no idea what they are about. But if they are a threat to provoking peadophiles then they need to be stopped too.
In many ways the worlds in a mess due to most peoples complacency or easy acceptance to all tha garbbage that the money makers are spewing out.
When I was a kid we saw cowboys get shot and fall off horses etc. Today we are taught in movies all the tricks to murdering, raping, making bombs and so the list goes on. The younger generations have seen so much of this they are no longer shocked - some want to experiment and see the real thing. Some get turned on when they see all the action portrayed of a woman being raped and go off and do it. There is no shock factor to help prevent their thoughts of doing such things from eventuating, because they have already gotten over the shocks etc after seeing so much of it in the movies and such.
It is time for the majority to foot their foot down otherwise heaven help the future... |
|
By: longweekend58
23/05/2008
7:48 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<It was like - you don't leave a heap of alcohol sitting around in your house if someone you know is an alcoholic is coming to visit or stay.>
But you dont get arrested for it either, if you do. That is a pretty serious distinction. |
|
By: longweekend58
23/05/2008
7:50 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<Reidsy I have never seen Huggies so I have no idea what they are about. But if they are a threat to provoking peadophiles then they need to be stopped too.
>
IN all of the dribble posted on here, THIS is the defining one. This is the comment that pretty much shows the ignorance of the ultra-moralists. |
|
By: longweekend58
23/05/2008
7:50 pm Yahoo! Profile:
longweekend58 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
<This bloke, along with Germain Greer(Book call Boys) have been flying under the radar for 15 years producing porn images of minors for petifiles. They say that the images are to produce the feeling of delite not desire.Well delite can seen in Adults nudes images but they are really pushing the evolope of delite with this child porn.>
This is the nig peopls room. When you can spell DELIGHT and construct a coherent post, come back. in the meantime go back to your game-boy. |
|
