By: slr2007mclaren
29/06/2009
8:05 pm Yahoo! Profile:
slr2007mclaren Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Not surprising though since a mindset of envy and subversion is the standard motivation of all leftist politics.
And that is of course why no one votes for the only left wing party we have..The Socialist Party.
=====
what's wrong with you crow?
you are starting to make sense?
if you look at their policies your above comment relates to the Greens |
|
By: kaboodleschnitzer
29/06/2009
8:06 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kaboodleschnitzer Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| but you let the original version go by without comment, andrei, and it was equally as absurd |
|
By: kaboodleschnitzer
29/06/2009
8:07 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kaboodleschnitzer Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| aussie - you are just another mindless right wing parrot like andrei and macca |
|
By: slr2007mclaren
29/06/2009
8:10 pm Yahoo! Profile:
slr2007mclaren Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
don't worry about kaboodle
he think's people on the right experience the same echo that resonates in his head
we are here to educate you kaboodle
. |
|
By: lotsaadelcrows
29/06/2009
8:15 pm Yahoo! Profile:
lotsaadelcrows Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
if you look at their policies your above comment relates to the Greens
tut tut, the Greens look like US Republicans compared to the nutjobs in the Socialist Party.
Its just easy and lazy politics for the extreme right to invoke the "anti everything" scare campaign of the 50's to try and scare people off the Greens.
As we know from experience the very people who instigate these lazy fear campaigns end up to be similar to the corrupt,self serving, wife beating, alcoholic, druggie Nixon. Or the mincing, cross dressing Hoover. |
|
By: aussiearisen
29/06/2009
8:15 pm Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Ah The Poodle, - Poodle, have a look at the USSR, and the Chinese model, or the gangster dictatorship which is Cuba.
Starting to get the message? All of those millions of people who`ve been starved, murdered and enslaved by their wonderful comrades. |
|
By: peterjpearson01
29/06/2009
8:18 pm Yahoo! Profile:
peterjpearson01 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Good grief....
macca's found hie 'echo' again. |
|
By: slr2007mclaren
29/06/2009
8:19 pm Yahoo! Profile:
slr2007mclaren Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| pity you still looking for your brain |
|
By: kaboodleschnitzer
29/06/2009
8:20 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kaboodleschnitzer Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| aussie - take a look at preObama US.. the plethora of right wing juntas in central and S America |
|
By: aussiearisen
29/06/2009
8:21 pm Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Its just easy and lazy politics for the extreme right to invoke the "anti everything" scare campaign of the 50's to try and scare people off the Greens."
Not a lot of thought went into that one eh? - The Greens ? - no policies, on plans, no ideas.
It`s no achievement to find fault with the world, but it`s another matter to be responsible and provide for others. |
|
By: aussiearisen
29/06/2009
8:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"aussie - take a look at preObama US.. the plethora of right wing juntas in central and S America"
Plenty wrong with total right wing thinking too, all fanatacism is wrong. Re this topic though, the left takes the cake for corruption. |
|
By: kaboodleschnitzer
29/06/2009
8:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
kaboodleschnitzer Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| not so - all pollies are equally prone to corruption, left or right. neither the left nor the right are necessarily inherently more susceptible. |
|
By: lotsaadelcrows
29/06/2009
8:38 pm Yahoo! Profile:
lotsaadelcrows Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
It`s no achievement to find fault with the world, but it`s another matter to be responsible and provide for others.
Sounds like commie talk to me. Responsible and provide for others? Its an individuals job to provide for themselves not the govts, unless your advocating socialism. |
|
By: aussiearisen
29/06/2009
8:41 pm Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"not so - all pollies are equally prone to corruption, left or right. neither the left nor the right are necessarily inherently more susceptible."
Not so poodle, and I`m not only accusing leftist politicians of a high rate of corruption, but all leftist systems. The mindset of the left is closer to the condonance of corruption than all others. |
|
By: aussiearisen
29/06/2009
8:55 pm Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
"Sounds like commie talk to me. Responsible and provide for others? Its an individuals job to provide for themselves not the govts, unless your advocating socialism."
okay, I suppose anyone can be a bit slow on the pickup at times.
I can see your argument against welfare - "Its an individuals job to provide for themselves not the govts,", which I agree with.
But you`ve totally missed the point re the Government`s responsibility of providing for others. - This was meant to state the obvious in that the Government has an obligation to implement effective policies to provide for the livelihood of it`s constituents.
Somehow though, this simple statement was edited into stupidity to the point of total misinterpretation. |
|
By: buzzanddidj
1/07/2009
1:02 am Yahoo! Profile:
buzzanddidj Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
UPDATE
Queensland Premier Anna Bligh swapped Parliament for the courtroom on Monday as a witness in the corruption trial of the former cabinet minister Gordon Nuttall.
Nuttall, 56, has pleaded not guilty to 36 charges of receiving secret payments from two prominent businessmen.
It is alleged the payments were made when he was a minister in the government of former premier Peter Beattie.
Ms Bligh was asked if Nuttall ever made her or Cabinet aware of this payment and she said: "No he did not."
But the Premier told the court she did remember a paper that had gone to Cabinet recommending Mr Shand for a role as director of the state's workers' compensation scheme, Work Cover.
She said she did not recall Nuttall raising any possible conflict of interest.
But defence barrister John Rivett further grilled Ms Bligh, asking her about her own thought process in not declaring a family holiday she had had in the home of Ros Kelly, a director of the construction company Thiess.
Ms Kelly is also a former federal minister.
Ms Bligh told the court she and Ms Kelly had been friends for some years
"My genuine view was that my visit didn't need to be registered because it didn't fall into the category of a gift or a conflict of interest," the premier said.
Ms Bligh is believed to be the first Queensland premier to give evidence in a criminal trial.
Outside the court she made reference to the state's watershed Fitzgerald Inquiry into official corruption in the 1980s.
"The fact that a minister can be charged, that a premier can give evidence for the prosecution, I think says how strong our justice system is, and 20 years on from Fitzgerald I think that's a very good thing," Ms Bligh said.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/30/2613 028.htm?section=justin
. |
|
By: codswal
1/07/2009
8:13 am Yahoo! Profile:
codswal Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| gee wizz.. under British justice. even Royals can take the stand....why is this woman so up herself??.maybe freebees from friends.. are her way of twisting the rules. what else is new? |
|
By: aussiearisen
1/07/2009
9:08 am Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| If she gets any more up herself, she`ll be inside out. Typical lefty with a bit of power. |
|
By: vegitamite97
1/07/2009
9:18 am Yahoo! Profile:
vegitamite97 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| gee, with all the fakeness the Liberals do, not a good track record, makes Turnbull look guilty before innocent. |
|
By: aussiearisen
1/07/2009
11:06 am Yahoo! Profile:
aussiearisen Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Were you programmed red at birth vegi? |
|
By: simonhall1900
1/07/2009
11:27 am Yahoo! Profile:
simonhall1900 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I find Rudd's short sharp responses are probably lies eg Dinner with Bourke "didn't know he was going to be there" Scores "too drunk to remember", "rang and apologised to my wife" Vietnam Dawn Service "no-one in my office organised anything"
Then I look at his response to The Email "it's is a fake, a forgery, a fraud" is he telling a lie or just describing himself? |
|
By: buzzanddidj
4/07/2009
12:18 am Yahoo! Profile:
buzzanddidj Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
UPDATE....
FORMER Queensland premier Peter Beattie has told a court a former minister in his Cabinet never declared any conflict of interest he had with mining executives Ken Talbot and Harold Shand.
Giving evidence via video-link from Los Angeles on the fifth day of Gordon Nuttall's corruption trial, Mr Beattie also said the former minister never declared the receipt of $300,000 from Mr Talbot between 2002 and 2005.
Mr Beattie said Mr Nuttall, 56, also failed to declare a $60,000 payment from Mr Shand in 2002.
"No, never,'' Mr Beattie told the Brisbane District Court.
"I would have remembered them, absolutely, and I would have taken certain actions had I known.''
The evidence was supported by former deputy premier Terry Mackenroth, who also briefly took the stand today to give evidence against Mr Nuttall.
Mr Mackenroth testified Mr Nuttall had failed to declare a conflict of interest during the two cabinet meetings the former deputy premier chaired in Mr Beattie's absence.
Mr Beattie said he was well known for taking a puritanical view towards ministers receiving money from people who had business interests with his government.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,257 27727-5005961,00.html
. |
|
By: andreihicks
4/07/2009
12:19 am Yahoo! Profile:
andreihicks Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
There's a Labor man I have always liked. I don't know why, just seemed a pretty fair fella every time I saw him.
Probably because I hated Bracks and Carr so much.. |
|
By: codswal
4/07/2009
9:07 am Yahoo! Profile:
codswal Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| are you talking about Beatie andrei???...gees I know you have twisted ideas about people but that one a doozy..why did he leave the job in such a hurry?????? |
|
By: buzzanddidj
4/07/2009
9:43 am Yahoo! Profile:
buzzanddidj Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
'why did he leave the job in such a hurry??????'
He DIDN'T
He was there for TEN YEARS
He left mid-term to give the new leader time to make her mark and managent style a chance to be recognised and appreciated befre the next election
A strategy that paid off
The Government was re-elected for a record FIFTH term
And Anna Bligh was endorsed by Queensland, in her OWN RIGHT
. |
|
