By: dallone.ranger
20/03/2009
12:00 am Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
By Ropes (Big Bunga);
your opinions will not solve any problems that white society has forced on the indigenous population.
~~~~~~
So what are some of the things that white people have forced upon Aboriginals? Well law and order is one, although many seem to totally ignore it, hence the reason why over 80% of the inmates in our jails in the NT are non white. Quite a few are there for sexual assaults on children, an offence which Ropes believes should not be a crime at all.
Well over 80% of domestic violence assaults are reported by non white women.
Alice Springs, the stabbing capital of OZ, usually by non white people.
Education has also been forced upon non white children in the NT, although just like with law and order, many seem to ignore it. Ropes has the answer though. Teach kids to read and write in pidgin English, the language mostly spoken in the community where he is working. That way, when these children reach working age, they will still be unable to be the boss, and will continually need people like Ropes to, to guide them.
And Ropes would have you believe that it is people like myself who compound the problems for non white people in communities. Sure son. |
|
By: steve_ropa
20/03/2009
7:58 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
based on scientific evidence that points to the fact that the earliest people were black, all other shades are mutations. It is a well-known and rather widely accepted scientific theory, with a lot of supporting evidence, that the reason that people's skin became lighter as they moved further north, and thus further away from the equator and it's warmer temperatures, is the fact that since people had to cover more skin to stay warm, and could not spend as much time outdoors, that their skin had to become lighter over the centuries, in order for their bodies to absorb enough sunlight to make enough vitamin d in order to survive. Other physical features that are commonly associated with certain shades of skin, are also adaptations to better survive in varied environments - i.e. people whose ancestors have lived for several hundred years or longer in high mountainous, snowy areas in certain Asian regions, may have eyes that are
more slanted because it helped to protect their eyes somewhat from the bright sun and its reflection off of the snow caps.
so, basically, the point is, Jesus was NOT white, and Adam and Eve were most probably black. And, if you want to get technical about it, white people are mutations, and, furthermore, as I want to say to the white supremacist, wanabe members of the KKK, who call themselves Christians, those kind of people need to wake up, because here's the real shocker - to all you lovers of pure breed whites, we're
all mutations; as far as I'm concerned, and you've technically got what you so racistly call black blood running through your veins. So wake up and get over yourself. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
20/03/2009
10:19 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
OK Ropes, I'll have a go.
Firstly, where is this scientific evidence which you say;
""points to the fact that the earliest people were black?""
~~
There is no way that I am aware of which scientists are able to tell the skin colour of 'Lucy', and those who came after her or before her.
What you are supposing/presuming, is that the first human types were black, from the word go, because those today from Africa are black. I think this is unsupportable scientifically. There is no more reason to think that they were black, than they were white. Were they white originally, they would have evolved darker skin over time to counter the climatic conditions which prevailed. Of course if the area where human types evolved was colder back in those days, millions of years ago, than it is today, then whiter skins would not be out of place. On the other hand if they began whiter, they would just have evolved darker skin if the climate at the time warranted it.
As for Jesus, he was probably the colour Arabs are today. 2,000 years is probably not long enough for evolution to make much difference. Also, back in his day they wore robes as they do today, so the sun was not such an issue as it was for those living in sub Sahara Africa at the time who were naked and black, like our Aboriginals. |
|
By: steve_ropa
20/03/2009
10:59 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| the knight of the meth lab. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
20/03/2009
11:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Also, why are there albino's amongst black Africans. Could it suggest that originally we were white, without melanin to protect us from the suns rays? |
|
By: dallone.ranger
20/03/2009
11:10 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
By Ropable;
the knight of the meth lab.
~~~~~
For effs sake you deadshit, I thought you wanted to have a intelligent discussion on YOUR bloody statement!
Stoned again aye! Can't function when you've had a few cones. Perhaps it's too strong for you Ropes, you obviously can't handle it. What a disappointment you remain. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
20/03/2009
11:33 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
OK Ropes, sleep it off and reply tomorrow, or whenever.
....sighs! |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
8:50 am Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
****For effs sake you deadshit, I thought you wanted to have a intelligent discussion on YOUR bloody statement!****
have you got a persecution complex, and do you think every post is aimed at you???????????? |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
9:07 am Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
****Also, why are there albino's amongst black Africans. Could it suggest that originally we were white, without melanin to protect us from the suns rays?****
it pays to do a little research before you make a fool of yourself with such absurd statements.
the evolution of humans and albinism are not related in any way. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
21/03/2009
11:53 am Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| OK, I admit that not a lot of thought went into my albino suggestion, and I appreciate you checking it out for us all. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
21/03/2009
12:10 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
And by Ropes this morning;
"do you think every post is aimed at you????????????"
~~~~~
Well quite frankly, yes. Most of your posts are. You even start threads directly aimed at me, or have you forgotten.
Furthermore, your large post on who came first, black people or white people, would have been posted up in the Oddly Enough threads, where the general public regularly visit, if you didn't expect me to reply.
So lets stop pretending that you expected an avalanche of other posters to reply here on the NT threads. You posted Ropes and I replied, that is what these boards are all about. |
|
By: dallone.ranger
21/03/2009
12:16 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
So Ropable, you haven't replied to my rebuttal of your supposedly scientific theory yet. Here, I'll re post it for you.
OK Ropes, I'll have a go.
Firstly, where is this scientific evidence which you say;
""points to the fact that the earliest people were black?""
~~
There is no way that I am aware of which scientists are able to tell the skin colour of 'Lucy', and those who came after her or before her.
What you are supposing/presuming, is that the first human types were black, from the word go, because those today from Africa are black. I think this is unsupportable scientifically. There is no more reason to think that they were black, than they were white. Were they white originally, they would have evolved darker skin over time to counter the climatic conditions which prevailed. Of course if the area where human types evolved was colder back in those days, millions of years ago, than it is today, then whiter skins would not be out of place. On the other hand if they began whiter, they would just have evolved darker skin if the climate at the time warranted it.
As for Jesus, he was probably the colour Arabs are today. 2,000 years is probably not long enough for evolution to make much difference. Also, back in his day they wore robes as they do today, so the sun was not such an issue as it was for those living in sub Sahara Africa at the time who were naked and black, like our Aboriginals. |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
1:12 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
this may come as a shock to all white skinned people.
of all the dark skinned people of the world, the australian aboriginal is ethnically closest to the white races.
more shock, horror for white races is that recent studies by experts in the field have put forward a theory that evolution of man didnt start in africa but in the continent
of australia.
can anyone prove it wrong???
i can hear the outrage already |
|
By: dallone.ranger
21/03/2009
1:43 pm Yahoo! Profile:
dallone.ranger Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
By Ropes;
more shock, horror for white races is that recent studies by experts in the field have put forward a theory that evolution of man didnt start in africa but in the continent
of australia.
can anyone prove it wrong???
i can hear the outrage already
~~~~~~~
It is wrong because I say it is wrong, also 99.99% of scientists agree with me.
You really are trying to hard to put down white folks, aye Ropes. But white folks do not care about the rantings of a brainless coot like you son. |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
2:02 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
****But white folks do not care about the rantings of a brainless coot like you son.****
and that's coming from someone who hasn't a clue about broadband, and is too lazy to do a search |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
2:09 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
****It is wrong because I say it is wrong, also 99.99% of scientists agree with me.****
ignorance at its worst
how many letters have you got after your name to make such a statement, and what makes you think the "scientists" got it right.
there are "scientists" who believe in god
"scientists" who believe in ET
"scientists" who have told the world that tobacco is not harmful
"scientists" of Scientology |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
2:10 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
i repeat, of all the dark skinned people of the world, the australian aboriginal is ethnically closest to the white races.
dispute that, you ignoramus |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
2:18 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| should i be calling you "lone rainger" from now on? |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
3:32 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
are you aware of the scientific theory of mitochondrian eve? scientists, through our mitochondria, have traced today's members of the human race all back to one woman, whom they call mitochondrian eve, based on the fact that we all have certain things in common in our mitochondria that we most likely would not all have in common unless we all shared a common ancestor. by the way, this woman was black.
DO THE RESEARCH |
|
By: givemeanidnow_03
21/03/2009
3:50 pm Yahoo! Profile:
givemeanidnow_03 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
DO THE RESEARCH
I think you need to do the research. Scientists have "potentially" traced back our ancestors to a common MAN through the male chromosome. They used DNA and other means to track back the Y chromosome. It's believed he lived approx 50,000 years ago.
The Mitochondrial Eve (corrected the spelling for you), is only a theory with significant research to be completed.
Might suggest you stop relying on Wikipedia for you info |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
7:14 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
***They used DNA and other means to track back the Y chromosome. It's believed he lived approx 50,000 years ago.***
cave painting in the north of WA have been carbon dated to be as old as 70,000 years old, can you explain that, or are you like most white people who ignorantly deny that their ancestors were black |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
7:16 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
***Might suggest you stop relying on Wikipedia for you info***
might suggest you stop relying on propaganda spread by so-called white experts |
|
By: steve_ropa
21/03/2009
7:22 pm Yahoo! Profile:
steve_ropa Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
****Scientists have "potentially" traced back our ancestors to a common MAN through the male chromosome.****
"potentially" unless men way back then gave birth |
|
By: givemeanidnow_03
21/03/2009
8:57 pm Yahoo! Profile:
givemeanidnow_03 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
cave painting in the north of WA have been carbon dated to be as old as 70,000 years old,
How is that relevant ? The quoted time of 50,000 years was the oldest date they could determine using current technology. Obviously mankind didn't just appear 50,000 years ago.
If we are going to try and hold an adult discussion could you please desist with moronic comments such as "or are you like most white people who ignorantly deny that their ancestors were black". There is nothing in my post indicating I held that view |
|
By: givemeanidnow_03
21/03/2009
9:00 pm Yahoo! Profile:
givemeanidnow_03 Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
might suggest you stop relying on propaganda spread by so-called white experts
Ok I should have read your other posts before my last comment. You are obviously someone who needs to hide their lack of education and intelligence by making childish comments. I really shouldn't have expected any better from Yahoo. |
|
