By: interscreener
10/07/2009
3:20 pm Yahoo! Profile:
interscreener Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Haven't read any of George Green's work. I'll check it out.
There is hope yet for us all. Each day a little more truth enters the world. Slowly the people are waking up to the great deception. Will we rise from the slumber of our own apathy? Will we finally take responsibility for our own destiny? The illusion of our current system is being torn down. The system is corrupt beyond repair. All those who believe that creating money out of thin air is a viable solution to this problem, are either deluded or have vested interests in maintaining the delusion. Stock exchanges like the NYSE are know openly manipulated. Criminal enterprises such as Goldman Sachs now openly control the markets. They, along with J.P. Morgan, are now responsible for 70% of all trades on the NYSE. See Joe Saluzzi of Themis Trading on Bloomberg T.V. explain the fictitious volume that is now proping up the U.S. Markets. The Plunge Protection Team is working overtime. Look out below! |
|
By: meowimback@ymail.com
9/07/2009
7:34 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: interscreener
9/07/2009
2:25 pm Yahoo! Profile:
interscreener Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Always a pleasure to hear from people who are enlightened and have the discernment to see through the military/industrial/pharm aceutical/banking criminal cartel that controls our puppet politicians.
Unfortunately though, the thought-control policies such as The Hate Crime Bill, which be voted on next week in the U.S.,will eventually shut down free speech on the net.
I think forums such as this are essential to our progression as a society, regardless if people disgree with each other.
These days it seems the disease of political correctness has mutated into a super-virus. If you can control the language, you can control society.
Our masters have been doing this for centuries. The elite know how to use psychological warfare on society, because they invented it. I've mentioned social engineering and predictive programming before, so just check out think tanks such as Tavistock, The Royal Institute for International Affairs, The Trilateral Commision and the Council on Foreign Relations.
Most social trends are engineered. The tools that are given to the slaves (us) by the masters(the elite) are given for a reason. Just look at T.V., movies, computer games, i-pods, cell-phones, etc. Look at the content. Do these tools bring us closer together? Do these movies and t.v. programs enlighten us on a daily basis? Does the majority of mainstream music make people feel better about themselves, or does it reinforce feelings of inadequency and self-doubt?
I'm not pointing out anything new here, but I get the feeling some people don't realize just how far down the road to tyranny we really are. The global economy has been hijacked by a criminal banking cartel, namely the Federal Reserve. This private bank controlled by an Elite group of families, has its tenticles spread all over the globe. It's influence penetrates every country, including Australia and the Reserve Bank. The RBA is a contributor to the Group of 30. Research Group of Thirty. |
|
By: stillonebetterthanyou
6/07/2009
7:32 pm Yahoo! Profile:
stillonebetterthanyou Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
THANKS interscreener
You have presented some excellent research.
I hope many others read what you posted
I was a child in the 50's and grew up in a large family.
My mother is a very intelligent woman who smelt a rat even way back then and being the protective mother that she was refused to let us be vaccinated when it was started enmasse .
When she found out there were cases of healthy children dying after they had vaccinations,she refused to let any of her 9 children be vaccinated.not one of us ever contracted any of the diseases the vaccinations were
manufactured for.
. |
|
By: vincenthavelundstephens
6/07/2009
5:33 pm Yahoo! Profile:
vincenthavelundstephens Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Hi All,
I don’t know anything about the baby bonus there was none when we were making children, I don’t think but maybe there was, anyhow I don’t know what it was worth.
My youngest daughter 30YOA has a girl 5 and boy 7 but Hubbie wants more and I try7 to help him by asking when I am to get another Grandchild.
Her Husband works real hard so she can be home all of the time with the children, but she has persisted in saying no. She says she want to go back to work and pay of their house quicker, he says he wants more children, and his business will pay the house off.
I have pointed out her sister has four so whats the problem, she is raising four with no problems.
Lately she seems to be changing her mind is that because of these baby bonuses, is there much money involved.
Its so different now my six are the delight of my life now, oh that there was a dozen, Vince |
|
By: jaymarcel
6/07/2009
7:21 am Yahoo! Profile:
jaymarcel Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Hi newideasfortheplanet,
When was the baby bonus first introduced in Oz & what makes you say it was only to increase the white population? |
|
By: onebetterthanyou@ymail.com
4/07/2009
10:28 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: vincenthavelundstephens
4/07/2009
2:06 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: onebetterthanyou@ymail.com
4/07/2009
1:54 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: newideasfortheplanet
3/07/2009
9:34 pm |
Message deleted. Reason: Breach of terms of service |
|
By: vincenthavelundstephens
3/07/2009
5:36 pm Yahoo! Profile:
vincenthavelundstephens Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
I would go along with anything positive towards increasing our population, by natural methods.
Its a bit hard to compete with some of these characters of a certain religion who have several live in women, and breed with the express purpose of increasing their numbers.
The women are apparently entitled to quite good payments for their children. There is one group I ahve seen with the male strutting the streets of Fairfield NSW with his feminine entourage and their children following behind.
I counted six women but their were to many children, there were a lot though including babies in prams.
Where do we draw the line dont know thats for sure. They reminded me of a rooster in a hen yard sheperding his hens and chickens everywhere. Oh and he doesnt work and they live in a very nice home courtesy I believe of Govt payments.
Gosh this line is now becoming the opposite of how it started and a good thing to, Vince |
|
By: jaymarcel
3/07/2009
1:53 pm Yahoo! Profile:
jaymarcel Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| At least thats a positive move, the baby bonus mainly encouraged the smoking alcoholic druggies to breed, the maternity paid leave is at least for the working, whilst also encouraging population growth of the non lazy type. |
|
By: mr_sarkasm
1/07/2009
1:35 pm Yahoo! Profile:
mr_sarkasm Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| should have stated that the paid maternity takes over from the baby bonus in certain income ranges etc. |
|
By: mr_sarkasm
1/07/2009
1:32 pm Yahoo! Profile:
mr_sarkasm Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Yup baby bonus will be scaled back.. gone for many actually.. for the paid maternity scheme... for similar amount though.hmmm yup thats a disincentive! |
|
By: jaymarcel
1/07/2009
9:42 am Yahoo! Profile:
jaymarcel Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| No worries Vince, I notice the baby bonus has gone up starting today also. Lets hope the gov can supply good free education to these new comers & narrow the class gap that has been growing over the years. |
|
By: vincenthavelundstephens
30/06/2009
12:17 pm Yahoo! Profile:
vincenthavelundstephens Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Hi Jay, my post was poorly presented I was replying to
interscreener not having a go at you. I am with you buddy we need more people here one day we may need them badly, Vince. |
|
By: jaymarcel
30/06/2009
7:24 am Yahoo! Profile:
jaymarcel Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| I'm just not into conspiracy theories, Australia has so much to gain from population growth or at least maintaining the same level. The world is still learning from Chinas mistakes with the one child policy. |
|
By: jaymarcel
30/06/2009
7:22 am Yahoo! Profile:
jaymarcel Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Hi Vince just to reply to your statement, before I emmigrated to Oz from the UK I worked in the R&D department at Glaxosmithkline & Roche, two of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world, I have been involved in the process from first discovery through to animal testing, clinical trials & eventually mass production so I do have a little background.
The only reason I left pharmaceuticals when I came to Australia is the money is not as good here more money in power, water, mining or working on the refineries. |
|
By: hehegirl@y7mail.com
29/06/2009
8:01 pm Yahoo! Profile:
hehegirl@y7mail.com Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| Are you for real, gardasil makes you infertile, I think not- my friend had her vaccination 6 months ago and she fell pregnant last week.hehe You don't want to end up being May be implantnon (implanted contraceptive) will make you sterile for 3 years, they stick that in your arm hehe. Flouridated water is good for your teeth otherwise you have decay and end up with falsies like some of those folks in the village hehe. |
|
By: vincenthavelundstephens
29/06/2009
7:15 pm Yahoo! Profile:
vincenthavelundstephens Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
jaymarcel, Let me write in the vernacular you are used to from me, and apolagize for my hilarity when I read the subject matter, but that original attitude hasnt changed.
Firstly to analyze a conpany as is being done when the post quotes shareholders and profits, one needs to know the issued capital, the Directors, CEO, CFO etc.
Then one has to break down the financials over three years at least not just the balance sheet, one must break up the trading accounts and look for extraordinary profits and what they reflect in those trade accounts.
Accounts may be presented in several ways, lets assume there has been huge R&D costs to bring the product to market, there may be tax reasons to inflate the trade accounts and reduce the balance sheet. Historically drug companies spend huge amounts of money to get a product to market and they may have to capitalize some of the costs, this could reduce direct costs and increase trade profit.
Your post is totally unsubstantiated and has no financial screen on which to base your statements, so again these are your own truths, that as a qualified person I find as nonsence.
Since you hypothecate the numbers I assume you also do the same with the rest of your innadequate studies.
Do you really know what it takes to get a drug to market and the different medical tests that have to be passed, no you dont else you would have listed same.
Have you read the professorial reports and studies or are you just looking at profits and names. This doesnt work, I have had clients doing tests for these drug companies you so easily defame. To get your story straight you need to get some of these experts to invite and enlighten you. WHEN YOU HAVE DONE THIS YOUR posts WILL HAVE YOUR own TRUTH, only then wil you be capable of trying to pass your truth on.
You were brutally honest with me now I have reciprocated in kind, do your homework, give us backed up facts, only then will you be fairly able to write the things you did, Vince |
|
By: interscreener
29/06/2009
6:59 pm Yahoo! Profile:
interscreener Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Interesting that bigus1im has mentioned the greenies. There are definately factions within the green movement that are adverse to humanity. Have you heard of Dr Eric Pianka a distingusished evolutionary ecologist from Texas? He calls for humanity to be wiped out using an airborne Ebola virus. He won the 2006 distinguished Texas Scientist award. Where ever he travels, academics and PHD students give him standing ovations, so your jesting is pretty interesting given the fact that these people are lauded by those that have the power to give awards such as the above mentioned.
You also mentioned lithium as well. Interesting! So you are implying I should take lithium...well maybe I'll have no choice soon. In the land of the rising sun, they are considering adding it to the water supply...so if that system comes here we might be drinking it together. If you don't believe me check out the newsscientist.com article from January 2009 entitled ' J...panese Researchers Suggest putting lithium in drinking water.' Truth is indeed stranger than fiction. It makes little difference I guess. The Australian population drinks fluorinated water. Fluoride was used by the National Socialist Party in the concentration camps to keep the prisoners docile. It is a scientific fact that fluoride consumption lower's your IQ.
So keep drinking your fluoride...and if you travel to the land of the rising sun, make sure to drink up....after all lithium is good for you! |
|
By: vincenthavelundstephens
29/06/2009
5:40 pm Yahoo! Profile:
vincenthavelundstephens Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Hi Jay, Its important we all talk freely, and if you think the Bible is Harry Potter in disguise, thats fine for you. I must write what I believe this is a contraversial subject, far more than economics of the now. The statements relating to American hegemony and the future enslavement of 10% of the population once it has been devastated as set out by the sponsor of this blog just happens, to be one that I am deeply adverse to.
THe only answer that can be given is a theological one, because the theory espoused is actually anti theology.
I am serious about this subject and have been all of my life, but i dont push my beliefs on others unless I want to refute he who would make such claims.
I believe deeply in the freedom of speech and thats what i have done, expressed myself in the theological background of one who believes impicitly in the Bible, and have done all of my life. Very sincerely Vince |
|
By: bigus1im
29/06/2009
4:31 pm Yahoo! Profile:
bigus1im Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| There's no way that the greedies would kill all their slaves. That's just paranoia. Better take your lithium. |
|
By: interscreener
29/06/2009
4:04 pm Yahoo! Profile:
interscreener Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
Fair comment. I would say that the baby bonus will be scaled back in the immediate future. I am wondering whether you had the opportunity to research the speech that Kevin Rudd was supposed to have given on December 15th 2008 at the National Press Club. The topic was Population Reduction Scheme. Exerts from the speech can be found by googling the above topic name. I was also wondering whether you had the opportunity to read about Sustainable Population Australia's call for a one child policy. This group is headed by formaer Democrat Sandra Kanck.
I think it is interesting that Rudd decided to not give the speech. I think he may be worried that people will put two and two together. I mean ,just last month the Rudd government wanted to vote on a cap and trade carbon emissions bill. If we think logically about this without getting emotional, it is clear that population reduction equals lower carbon emissions. Regardless of people's need to negate anybody who seems informed, a one-child policy is coming because we are heading towards a one world government. Like it or not, either a one child policy will be introduced or taxes will be imposed on those who choose to have more than one child.
I'm not saying it will happen tomorrow of next year, but I hazard a guess that it will be withing the next 5-7 years.
P.S. If you have children DO NOT VACCINATE THEM AGAINST THE H1N1 VIRUS. It more than likely contains agents that will sterilize your children or possibly harm them. |
|
By: jaymarcel
29/06/2009
3:28 pm Yahoo! Profile:
jaymarcel Did this message offend you?
Sign in to report abuse |
Reply to this message |
| So what of the baby bonus, that's a gov way of growing population? Not downsizing it. And it worked (mainly for the young unemployed). |
|
